The filing paints a picture of extensive wealth held largely through family trusts and investment interests.
In all, the disclosure contains roughly 3,290 separate asset entries. The largest share of the reported wealth is connected to trusts benefiting Khanna’s dependent children, with reported minimum holdings ranging from about $61.7 million to at least $153.7 million. Additional assets were attributed to his wife, Ritu Ahuja Khanna.
The scale of investment activity is also likely to raise eyebrows.
Family trusts connected to the household reported 5,402 transactions during 2025, according to the disclosure. Those trades occurred across 244 of the year’s 251 active trading days.
The reported value of the transactions ranged from approximately $44.6 million to $164.4 million.
Purchases accounted for between $26.2 million and $93.8 million, while sales ranged from roughly $18.4 million to $70.6 million. The transactions involved stocks, options, exchange-traded funds, and other financial instruments.
That was an increase from the previous year, when the household reported 4,665 transactions with a total value ranging from $36.4 million to $137.2 million.
The investments also generated substantial income.
The disclosure listed as much as $10.8 million in dividends and business distributions. Trusts benefiting the couple’s children reportedly brought in more than $2 million in unearned income from ownership interests connected to private golf clubs in Ohio.
Those holdings include interests associated with Barrington Golf Club in Aurora, as well as properties tied to ARECO Golf, including Mayfield Country Club and Sand Ridge Golf Club. Initiation fees at some of the clubs reportedly exceed $30,000 to $45,000.
The children’s trusts also hold interests in MAI Capital Management, a Cleveland-based wealth management company, along with hedge funds and other private investment vehicles.
Much of the family’s reported fortune traces back to Khanna’s father-in-law, Monte Ahuja, an Ohio auto-parts executive and the founder of Transtar Industries. The assets are largely held through irrevocable trusts established for the benefit of Khanna’s wife and children.
Khanna has previously maintained that he does not direct the individual trades or have knowledge of the specific transactions because the trusts are independently managed by professionals.
His congressional salary, meanwhile, remains $174,000 per year.
Still, the disclosure highlights how dramatically the household’s reported financial holdings have grown since Khanna first entered Congress. In 2017, his household assets were reported in a range of approximately $29 million to $78 million.
The financial disclosure is drawing particular attention because Khanna has consistently pushed for policies aimed at the country’s wealthiest individuals.
He co-sponsored legislation with Senator Bernie Sanders that would impose a 5 percent annual wealth tax on billionaires. Khanna has also supported a California proposal calling for a one-time 5 percent tax on residents with a net worth exceeding $1 billion.
Khanna has argued that such policies are necessary to combat extreme wealth concentration and spread economic opportunity more broadly.
He has also been an outspoken critic of stock trading by members of Congress and has supported restrictions designed to prevent lawmakers from personally profiting from trades while serving in office.
The latest disclosure, however, underscores the contrast critics are likely to highlight: a congressman who frequently attacks the influence of enormous fortunes is connected to a household with tens of millions of dollars in assets, thousands of financial transactions, and millions in investment income.
There is an important distinction in the filing. The wealth and trading activity are largely connected to independently managed family trusts rather than trades personally executed by Khanna, according to his previous statements.
Even so, the disclosure provides a detailed look at the financial interests surrounding one of Congress’s most prominent progressive lawmakers.
Khanna’s office has not released a detailed public statement specifically addressing the latest filing beyond earlier assertions that the family’s arrangements comply with applicable ethics requirements and that the trusts operate independently.
The filing remains publicly available through the House Clerk’s financial disclosure system, as well as through independent records and transcriptions.
For a politician who has made the fight against concentrated wealth a central part of his public identity, the extraordinary size and complexity of the financial empire connected to his household is certain to keep the debate alive.
The question now is not simply how much wealth Khanna’s family controls. It is whether voters will see the arrangement as evidence that even Washington’s most vocal critics of the wealthy can remain deeply connected to the world of massive private fortunes—or whether the independently managed trust structure will persuade them that Khanna’s political message and his family’s financial reality are two separate matters.
