>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
Some of the real examples included in the quiz are even more shocking than the fictional ones.
One confirmed federal program involves the Department of Defense spending an estimated $77 million annually on training military dolphins—despite the fact that modern underwater drone systems have largely replaced such animal-based operations. Critics have long questioned why the program still receives funding, but it continues to appear in defense budgets year after year.
The quiz is not just meant as political entertainment. It is designed as a stress test for how desensitized Americans have become to federal spending excess.
Behind the humor, Paul ties the quiz to his broader investigation into government waste, known as the “Festivus Report.” His latest edition documents a staggering $1,639,135,969,608 in estimated wasteful spending.
That figure alone has become a central talking point in fiscal debates on Capitol Hill.
Among the examples highlighted in the report are $13.8 million spent on beagle experiments, $14.6 million used to fund research where monkeys played a “Price Is Right”-style video game, and $2.1 million spent collecting saliva samples from EDM nightclub attendees in New York City to study drug use patterns.
Another $40 million was directed by HHS toward social media influencers promoting COVID-19 vaccinations to specific demographic groups, while the State Department reportedly spent $244,000 producing a Pakistani cartoon aimed at teaching children about climate change.
Each of those expenditures is documented as real federal spending.
But the most alarming figure in Paul’s report is not the unusual line items—it’s what they represent in the broader fiscal picture.
Buried within the $1.6 trillion in waste is an even larger issue: $1.22 trillion in annual interest payments on the national debt.
That number reflects how much the federal government now spends just to service its borrowing. It exceeds the entire defense budget, underscoring how deeply entrenched deficit spending has become in Washington’s financial structure.
The national debt itself has now surpassed $36 trillion, according to Treasury data, and continues to climb year after year. Interest payments alone reached record highs in 2025, creating what fiscal conservatives describe as a compounding crisis with no clear exit strategy.
Former President Donald Trump and budget-cutting efforts associated with the Department of Government Efficiency (“DOGE”) attempted to rein in spending, but faced strong opposition in Congress.
Senate Democrats, including Chuck Schumer, have repeatedly blocked what they describe as “reckless” cuts. Meanwhile, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has called such reductions “cruel.”
Supporters of the current spending framework argue that government programs serve critical social and economic needs. Critics counter that the system has evolved into one that perpetuates itself—funding not only essential services but also experimental, controversial, and in some cases seemingly absurd projects.
Despite attempts at reform, federal spending still increased by roughly 2 percent in the first five months of fiscal 2026, even after targeted reductions tied to DOGE initiatives. The long-term trajectory remains upward, with no sustained shift toward deficit reduction.
Paul has been publishing his Festivus Report annually since 2015, arguing that government waste is not an anomaly but a pattern. Each year, he says, the numbers grow, and each year Washington continues as before.
From “cocaine dogs” studies to ferret alcohol experiments, the examples may sound like political satire—but they are drawn from official spending records.
The underlying message of the quiz is simple: if Americans can no longer tell what their government is actually funding, accountability has already broken down.
The quiz concludes with a challenge that reflects Paul’s broader political argument. It is not just about identifying absurd spending—it is about recognizing how normalized that spending has become.
Participants can take the test at Rand Paul “Real or Fake” Quiz, then compare their answers against the official breakdown.
Whether viewed as satire, critique, or warning, the quiz is designed to leave one impression: in Washington, reality is often stranger—and far more expensive—than fiction.
