>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
Biase’s candid comments didn’t stop there. He openly criticized the motivations behind the prosecution, stating, “The whole thing is disgusting, and they’re out to get him… and that’s why, like, he’s surging in the polls. You know, it’s a perversion of justice.” These statements suggest that even key officials within the DOJ are not fully aligned with the efforts to bring down Trump through legal channels.
The implications of this undercover footage are far-reaching. While Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is a local prosecutor, his actions hold significant national political weight. As a Democrat, Bragg’s office has been under intense scrutiny, with critics alleging that the prosecution of Trump is laced with political motivations. Biase’s comments now add fuel to that fire. Trump’s legal team has been working to overturn his conviction, citing a Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity, and Bragg has indicated that he will not oppose Trump’s motion to delay sentencing.
During Trump’s trial, his defense team argued that Bragg had stretched the limits of the law, reviving charges that should have been long expired under the state’s statute of limitations. Biase, in his undercover conversation, seemed to echo this sentiment. “[Bragg] was stacking charges and rearranging things just to make it fit a case. No, to be honest with you I think the case is nonsense,” Biase said. He went on to describe state-level prosecution as a “Wild West” where federal oversight is weaker, allowing politically motivated prosecutions to flourish. “They’re like idiots, they don’t care, they’re all political, so yeah. [Bragg] is probably gonna try to lock him up,” Biase added.
WATCH:
The remarks made by Biase also shed light on his personal relationship with Bragg. According to Biase, he has known the Manhattan DA for 15 years, well before Bragg took office in 2021. Bragg’s tenure has been marked by his efforts to reform the justice system, focusing on reducing prosecutions for low-level offenses. However, his progressive approach has faced criticism, especially as New York City has experienced a rise in violent crime, including attacks on high-profile individuals and law enforcement officers by newly arrived migrants. Biase’s comments suggest that Bragg’s decision to prosecute Trump was motivated by the publicity and political gain it could bring, rather than by a genuine interest in justice.
At one point in the undercover footage, Biase alludes to Bragg’s lesser-known status before taking on the Trump case. “Did you know who he was before he tried to prosecute Trump?” Biase asked the journalist. “You do now.” His statement implies that Bragg’s pursuit of Trump is not only political but also serves to elevate his own profile in the public eye.
Brutal “Pocket Weapon” Stops Hearts (discounted for next 78)
This undercover sting operation has unveiled a troubling reality—one where even those in the highest echelons of the justice system admit to the political motivations driving prosecutions. Biase’s comments will likely intensify the already fierce debate over the integrity of Trump’s legal battles and the fairness of the justice system as a whole. Conservatives will undoubtedly seize on this admission as further evidence that the efforts to prosecute Trump are part of a larger political agenda to prevent his return to the White House.
