>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
Blaze Media reported staggering numbers: “For a hospital system that treats 5,000 COVID patients over the course of the pandemic, Remdesivir alone could deliver close to $100M in federal reimbursements or $20,000 per patient.” Additionally, Medicare payments for extended ventilator support exceeded $40,000 per patient.
Handwritten letters from grieving families, included in legal briefs, paint a harrowing picture of hospital protocols allegedly prioritizing profits over patient safety. Many families claim their loved ones were unnecessarily put on ventilators or given remdesivir, resulting in fatal outcomes.
Remdesivir, a drug authorized for emergency use by the FDA in October 2020, has been described as highly toxic by numerous medical professionals. Dr. David Martin, speaking before the Oklahoma state legislature, delivered a scathing indictment of the drug, stating it caused severe organ damage and hastened deaths.
Adding to the controversy, the World Health Organization recommended against using remdesivir for COVID-19 treatment as early as November 2020. Despite this, hospitals continued administering the drug, citing federal emergency use authorizations as their defense.
The National Library of Medicine reported fatality rates for ventilator use as alarmingly high, with older patients seeing mortality rates climb to 84%. Critics argue that the “rush” to place patients on ventilators was incentivized by financial rewards, not medical necessity.
The legal filings also allege that attending physicians and nurses faced coercion to follow hospital protocols, even when they believed the treatments were harmful. Physicians attempting to use alternative treatments, such as ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine, were reportedly threatened with the loss of medical licenses or hospital privileges.
As a result, many medical professionals complied with protocols they allegedly knew were dangerous. This compliance, critics argue, amounted to a gross violation of the Hippocratic Oath to “do no harm.”
The submitted legal briefs outline what the Vires Law Group calls “monstrous crimes,” urging state attorneys general to convene grand juries. The evidence includes detailed accounts from families, medical records, and financial data allegedly demonstrating hospital practices motivated by profit over patient care.
The question remains: Why did hospital administrators and policymakers advocate for treatments they knew to be harmful? The answer may lie in the billions of dollars distributed to hospitals during the pandemic.
What are the best concealed carry holsters for ultimate security?
As these cases unfold, attorneys general are tasked with determining whether probable cause exists to issue indictments. If pursued, such prosecutions could represent a seismic shift in accountability for pandemic-related policies.
For families who lost loved ones, justice may finally be within reach. “It is time for… district attorneys to determine if there is probable cause to convene a grand jury, present evidence of these monstrous crimes, issue indictments, and prosecute the accused to the full extent of the law,” legal briefs argue.
The unfolding battle highlights the limits of federal immunity and the enduring power of state law. For Fauci and other officials, state prosecutions could become a defining chapter in the pandemic’s legacy.
