>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
“He must resign. We should be collectively calling for his resignation. He is unfit, as much of the cabinet is unfit, but he is especially unfit.
“Resignation is the right thing, and he if he doesn’t resign, this guy Lutnick, I think the president is really good at firing people. Remember, ‘You’re fired! You’re fired!’ He needs to fire him.”
The comments were emblematic of a broader pattern on the show — aggressive rhetoric aimed squarely at Trump-world figures. As even People magazine has noted in the past, Trump’s White House never hesitated to respond forcefully to attacks coming from “The View.”
But the show’s posture shifted dramatically this week.
On Tuesday, the panel struck a noticeably softer tone after revelations that one of their own — co-host Whoopi Goldberg — was named in the Epstein files.
After avoiding the subject for multiple episodes, Goldberg finally addressed it directly, attempting to put distance between herself and Epstein.
“My name is in the files, yes,” Goldberg admitted. “And what does it say? It says Whoopi needs a plan to get to Monaco [for Julian Lennon’s charity function].”
According to Goldberg, the mention amounted to nothing more than a logistical request that never materialized. She emphasized that no meeting occurred and no relationship existed beyond that brief reference.
“So in other words, anybody can be on this list,” co-host Joy Behar chimed in.
“Well, this is my point,” Goldberg replied. “Because I tell you when I’m telling you, people are trying to turn me into — I wasn’t his girlfriend. I wasn’t his friend.”
She went on to add, “You used to have to have facts before you said stuff.”
The irony of that statement did not go unnoticed by critics. Almost immediately, Behar pivoted the conversation back toward Trump, referencing how often his name appears in the Epstein documents — despite the absence of any evidence linking the former president to criminal activity tied to Epstein.
Goldberg declined to engage in that line of attack, choosing instead to continue defending herself and stressing that mere inclusion in the files does not equal guilt.
You can watch the entire episode for yourself below:
The segment wrapped with the co-hosts acknowledging that the Epstein documents include an enormous number of well-known figures and that innocent people can easily become collateral damage in the media frenzy. In Goldberg’s case, the panel urged caution, restraint, and fairness.
Notably absent, however, was that same presumption of innocence when the discussion turned to Trump.
For critics of the show, the episode underscored a familiar double standard: when conservatives or Trump allies are named, the calls for resignations come fast and loud. When a member of “The View” finds herself mentioned, the panel suddenly demands nuance, facts, and grace.
Viewers can judge the exchange for themselves, but the contrast was difficult to miss — and for many Americans, it reinforced growing skepticism about how legacy media outlets handle politically inconvenient facts.
