>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
The sudden shift dramatically altered the standings. Election officials estimate that approximately 146,000 ballots remain uncounted. Despite once holding a comfortable advantage, Pratt now trails Raman by more than 3,000 votes. Just days earlier, Raman was reportedly behind by roughly 40,000 votes.
The changing vote totals have fueled growing concerns among election observers and Pratt supporters. Earlier vote counts showed Pratt performing strongly among mail-in ballots received by Election Day. However, ballots arriving after Election Day have broken heavily in favor of Democratic candidates, creating a stark contrast in voting patterns.
That dramatic divide has led many to ask difficult questions about the source of the late-arriving votes and whether voters can have confidence in the process. Critics argue that the sudden swing deserves closer examination, particularly given the magnitude of the turnaround.
During election coverage, ABC7 anchor Jory Rand acknowledged the possibility that the race could still change course. Rand suggested that Pratt could “somehow” stage a comeback if “we see a batch in the last couple of days of those mail-in ballots that were heavy on Spencer Pratt.”
WATCH:
Despite that possibility, several election analysts are already forecasting a November showdown between Raman and Bass. Many observers believe the current trajectory favors Raman unless future ballot releases significantly alter the trend.
The momentum shift has been building over several days. Earlier reporting showed Raman making major gains through late-arriving mail ballots, cutting deeply into Pratt’s advantage. What had once appeared to be a comfortable lead steadily evaporated as additional vote batches were processed.
On Friday, Pratt held an advantage of nearly 21,000 votes over Raman. By Saturday, that margin had shrunk dramatically to just 7,494 votes, representing roughly 1.1 percent of all ballots counted at the time.
Meanwhile, election integrity concerns have received additional attention from federal officials.
First Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California Bill Essayli announced Friday that his office is conducting “multiple election fraud investigations” in coordination with the FBI. He also revealed that officials are working with the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division on what he described as a comprehensive review of California’s voter rolls.
Essayli further raised concerns regarding voter identification requirements in California. According to his statement, acceptable forms of identification can include gym membership cards, employer identification cards, credit or debit cards, prescription drug labels, and insurance cards.
He also expressed concern regarding voter roll maintenance, stating, “We also have serious concerns about how California maintains its voter rolls. There are open questions about whether the state is promptly removing deceased voters, people who have moved, and individuals convicted of disqualifying felonies.”
Those remarks are likely to intensify debate surrounding the election as vote counting continues.
Adding to the attention surrounding the process, Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert Renner was reportedly present at the Los Angeles County ballot processing center on Friday. Reports indicate that Renner observed ballot handling operations and questioned officials about various aspects of the counting procedures.
With thousands of ballots still awaiting tabulation and federal officials examining election-related concerns, the Los Angeles mayoral race remains far from settled. The coming days could prove decisive as election workers continue counting votes and candidates await the final outcome.
This remains a developing story, and additional updates are expected as new ballot totals are released.
