>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
The report’s lead researcher stated that the Chinese side was not simply collaborating for the sake of scholarship. Instead, they were reverse engineering American intelligence systems, reproducing experimental frameworks, and transferring that knowledge back to Beijing’s military apparatus.
One striking example centers on IARPA’s BRIAR Program, an initiative reportedly funded at $11 million to develop advanced methods of identifying individuals based on gait patterns and body structure. This type of biometric technology is designed to enhance counterterrorism capabilities and strengthen border security operations.
The principal investigator for BRIAR is a faculty member at Michigan State University. According to the Parallax findings, that same academic was also engaged in parallel research with China’s Southern University of Science and Technology, an institution widely acknowledged to maintain connections to Beijing’s defense research ecosystem.
The situation becomes even more troubling. The same Michigan State researcher has allegedly collaborated with the deputy director of China’s liaison office in Hong Kong, an individual placed on the U.S. Treasury Department’s sanctions list as a blocked entity acting on behalf of a targeted foreign government. When asked to address these concerns, Michigan State University declined substantive comment and referred inquiries to its conflict of interest policies.
Even more alarming are the findings related to quantum computing. A 2023 publication linked to IARPA’s LogiQ Program included a co author from the China Academy of Engineering Physics. CAEP is widely recognized as China’s premier nuclear weapons research institution and operates under the authority of the Central Military Commission. It has appeared on the U.S. Entity List since 2020, barring American companies from exporting certain advanced technologies to it.
Yet despite those restrictions, a researcher affiliated with CAEP participated in work tied to IARPA’s quantum computing initiative, a program intended to bolster capabilities across the entire U.S. Intelligence Community.
Former U.S. Ambassador Joseph Cella reviewed the report and described China’s involvement in these programs as “grave national security threats.” He urged policymakers to immediately begin de risking and, in some areas, fully decoupling from Chinese research institutions.
Neither the Office of the Director of National Intelligence nor IARPA responded to requests for comment regarding the allegations.
The controversy also reignites debate over past Justice Department policies. The Trump administration launched the China Initiative in 2018 to address intellectual property theft and foreign infiltration of American research. Critics on the left attacked the program, arguing it unfairly targeted researchers of Chinese descent. In 2022, the Biden administration formally ended the initiative.
One of the report’s authors, L.J. Eads, cautioned that “This report only scratches the surface of a much larger and more serious research security problem.”
China has openly declared its ambition to reach military parity with the United States by 2027, including in nuclear and strategic systems. The Parallax findings suggest that elements of that effort may have benefited from U.S. taxpayer funded research conducted inside America’s own intelligence programs.
The pressing question now is whether current intelligence leadership will conduct a comprehensive audit of IARPA funded projects and determine the extent of any ongoing foreign ties. If the report’s conclusions hold, the implications are profound. America’s most advanced intelligence research may have been more accessible to Beijing than anyone in Washington was willing to admit.
