>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
He went further, describing his reaction to public praise of Kyle’s service and legacy:
“I almost felt like there was like a weird practical joke being played on me by the war that, like, all these years later, I’m, like, having to, like… People are telling me, like, ‘Oh, look how great this guy is, these guys are amazing heroes’ — this whole incredible thing. The paragon of leadership, and I’m just sitting there, like, ‘Am I living in, like, an alternate reality?’ Because this is the exact opposite of my experience,” Platner, a Marine Corps and Army veteran who served three tours in Iraq and one in Afghanistan, added.
The remarks quickly sparked backlash from supporters of Kyle’s legacy, including his widow, Taya Kyle, who pushed back strongly against Platner’s portrayal of her late husband.
Speaking to Fox News, she rejected the claims and said the comments were both inaccurate and deeply painful for her family.
“My family and I, my kids and I, we’d love to get on here and say, ‘It doesn’t matter when people say things like that’ … but the truth is, it does hurt.”
She continued by directly challenging Platner’s credibility and connection to her husband’s service.
“Something like this, where it’s so obvious to us that [Platner] did not know him, that he’s making things up, that it’s the polar opposite of what Chris said and did, it cheapens it,” she added. “I can’t imagine anyone voting for somebody like that.”
Chris Kyle, whose life and service were chronicled in his bestselling book American Sniper, was killed in 2014 at a Texas shooting range. He was fatally shot by a former Marine Corps veteran who was suffering from severe post-traumatic stress disorder while Kyle was attempting to help him.
The renewed attention on Platner’s past statements has also revived scrutiny of other controversial online posts attributed to him.
In one now-deleted Reddit account from 2019, Platner commented on combat footage involving U.S. Army veteran Ted Daniels, who was wounded during a 2012 engagement in Afghanistan while serving alongside his unit.
Referring to viral helmet-cam footage, Platner wrote:
“This video never gets old,” referring to viral footage taken by PFC Ted Daniels’s helmet cam during a clash with Taliban fighters in 2012.
He then added sharply critical and explicit remarks about Daniels’ conduct:
“Dumb motherfer didn’t deserve to live. At least his stupidity and fat a wheezing are available for all future infantrymen to witness and hold in contempt. Poor marksmanship on the Taliban’s part is the only reason this mouthbreather made it home, he managed to make every possible s** decision possible when it comes to small unit combat,” Platner wrote.
Daniels, however, previously described the engagement very differently in an interview with The Washington Post in 2012, explaining that he moved into exposed terrain intentionally in order to draw enemy fire away from his fellow soldiers. Despite the intensity of the firefight, all members of his unit survived the encounter.
In a more recent interview with the New York Post, Daniels responded to Platner’s resurfaced comments with a mix of frustration and defiance.
“I’m very thick-skinned, and he said it… I don’t want an apology, and any apology from him [Graham] at this point would definitely not be sincere.”
He then called on Democratic Party leadership to address the controversy directly, naming several high-profile figures.
“What I’d really like is for [Sen.] Elizabeth Warren, [Senate Minority Leader] Chuck Schumer, [Sen.] Bernie Sanders, [House Minority Leader] Hakeem Jeffries, and everybody else on the far left to tell my children to their face that they are endorsing and supporting a man who said that their father should have not lived. Cheering on the death of their father,” the veteran said.
Daniels also questioned whether Platner would be willing to confront him directly, suggesting that online rhetoric often differs from real-world accountability.
“I’m a pretty intimidating person to stand in front of, and it’s easy for them to shoot a mouth off behind a keyboard, but face to face, it’s crickets,” he said, adding, “and I kind of wonder what Graham Platner’s response would be if he were face to face with me.”
As the Senate race intensifies, the resurfaced remarks continue to fuel political and cultural debate, adding another layer of controversy to an already closely watched contest in Maine.
