>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
The Pivotal Debate Moment
During the debate with Republican opponent Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, Spanberger was asked point-blank whether she would retract her endorsement.
After acknowledging she was “aware of” Jones’ remarks, Spanberger tried to sidestep: “I denounced them when I learned of them and I will denounce them every chance I get.”
But Earle-Sears wasn’t letting her off the hook. She pressed again for a clear yes or no.
“I didn’t hear an answer on [the Jones] question,” moderator Deanna Albrittin jumped in, giving Spanberger 15 seconds to respond directly.
That’s when the Democrat pivoted yet again: “We are all running our individual races. I believe my opponent has said that about her lieutenant governor nominee. And it’s up to every person to make their own decision. I am running my race to serve Virginia, and that is what I intend to do.”
Once again — no answer.
The moderators gave her a third opportunity to clarify, but Spanberger repeated the same vague talking points about “individual races.”
That’s when Earle-Sears finally turned to her rival and dropped the line that made headlines: “Would it take Jones pulling the trigger for you to pull your endorsement?”
The audience audibly gasped.
Spanberger’s Debate Performance Draws Criticism
Beyond her evasive answers, Spanberger drew additional criticism for her demeanor throughout the night. Viewers noted she refused to make eye contact with Earle-Sears, even as her opponent addressed her directly.
In another viral exchange, Earle-Sears blasted Spanberger for her slow response to condemn a racist sign displayed by a left-wing protester at one of Earle-Sears’ events.
The sign — aimed at the Black Republican candidate — said she should be forced to use a separate water fountain if she opposed biological males competing in women’s sports.
A Race Tightening by the Day
The debate came at a critical moment for Spanberger, whose once-comfortable lead appears to be slipping.
A recent Cygnal poll found her leading Earle-Sears by just four points, with another 5.6% of voters still undecided. That’s a significant drop from September’s seven-point margin — a sign the race is tightening fast.
As voters watch these moments unfold, Spanberger’s refusal to clearly denounce her party’s violent nominee could become a defining moment in the final stretch of the campaign.
Bottom Line:
Abigail Spanberger had multiple chances to disavow a Democratic candidate who threatened to murder a Republican lawmaker and his family — and she refused every single time.
The question now: What does it say about the state of the Democrat Party when even death threats can’t earn a clean break from one of its rising stars?
