>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
The company’s excuse? A dramatic cattle shortage.
But here’s the problem: there isn’t one.
The Data Doesn’t Match Tyson’s Excuse
Tyson executives claim “unprecedented cattle shortages,” yet government numbers show U.S. cattle inventory dipped only three percent compared to last year — well within normal livestock cycles.
Even more revealing, Tyson’s own filings show they spent two billion dollars more buying cattle this year than last year. That’s not what you do when supply collapses. That’s what you do when competition is fierce and you’re bidding aggressively.
U.S. Senator Deb Fischer summed it up plainly, saying, “It’s no secret that just a few years ago, packers like Tyson were making windfall profits while the rest of the industry was continuously in the red.”
The Pandemic Profit Boom Tyson Wants Buried
During the COVID lockdown chaos, beef prices soared and processors capitalized on it. Tyson’s beef division raked in $636 million in a single quarter — more than double the previous year. While everyday Americans skipped steaks to stretch their budgets, Tyson printed money.
Now that ranchers are beginning to rebuild their herds after brutal droughts, suddenly Tyson claims it must slash capacity? That’s not responding to the market. That’s shaping the market.
Nebraska Cattlemen noted that feedlot inventories in the state are still above last year’s levels, pointing out the plant didn’t shut due to a lack of cattle.
A Pattern of “Shut It Down, Strip It Out”
Rep. Mike Flood reminded Nebraskans what happened the last time Tyson pulled a similar move. Back in 2006, after shutting down the plant in Norfolk, Tyson stripped it so thoroughly it could never reopen.
As Flood said, “That plant still sits empty today.”
He added, “Tyson needs to preserve it, so it can remain a beef processing operation and keep good paying jobs in Dawson County that support our ag communities.”
This isn’t an isolated decision. It’s a pattern.
Four Corporations Hold America’s Beef Supply Hostage
Here’s the part the industry never wants discussed: just four companies — Tyson, JBS, Cargill, and National Beef — control eighty-five percent of beef processing nationwide. In the late 1970s, that number was twenty-five percent.
That level of concentration doesn’t just influence the marketplace — it controls it.
When these giants reduce capacity, cattle prices fall for ranchers while consumer prices continue rising. And because they dominate the entire sector, there’s nowhere else for ranchers to go.
The company claims it will make up the difference by increasing production at other facilities, yet no corporation closes a fully operational 5,000-head-per-day plant unless it benefits from reduced supply.
Engineered Scarcity, Not Market Forces
As drought conditions ease and ranchers restock their herds — part of the cattle industry’s natural ten-year cycle — Tyson’s decision ensures bottlenecks remain. Even if ranchers raise more cattle, they now face the question: who will process them?
That means higher prices for families, lower prices for ranchers, and bigger margins for the processors holding all the leverage.
President Donald Trump previously ordered the DOJ to investigate meatpacking companies for “illicit collusion.” This latest shutdown shows exactly why that investigation still matters.
You don’t need secret meetings when four companies control nearly the entire market. All you need are a few strategic closures.
The Bottom Line
America doesn’t have a beef shortage. It has a processing monopoly that manufactures scarcity, squeezes ranchers, and drains consumers.
Tyson’s latest move isn’t about survival.
It’s about control.
