>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
But they didn’t care. According to the new documents, these corrupt officials used the Steele fiction as ammo in a campaign to “screw Trump”—and now, it’s clear Obama wasn’t just watching. He was calling the shots.
Buried in the report is this chilling phrase: “The IC is prepared to produce an assessment per the President’s request…”
According to Fox News Digital, the Obama administration “manufactured and politicized intelligence” in order to fabricate the appearance of Russian interference in the 2016 election—even though their own analysts warned that no such interference occurred.
Tulsi Gabbard’s release of the documents paints a damning picture. Right after Trump’s stunning win over Hillary Clinton, the Obama White House pivoted to full-blown sabotage mode, laying the groundwork for what would become the years-long witch hunt known as the Trump-Russia probe.
And it gets worse.
In the months leading up to Election Day, the intelligence community clearly assessed that Russia “probably was not trying to influence the election by using cyber means.” No evidence. No cyber attacks. No manipulation of results.
The report plainly stated:
“We assess that foreign adversaries did not use cyber attacks on election infrastructure to alter the US Presidential election outcome this year. We have no evidence of cyber manipulation of election infrastructure intended to alter results.”
“We assess that Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure.”
Translation? The entire “Russia hacked the election” story was built on a lie.
Last week, investigative journalist Paul Sperry said Obama’s fingerprints were all over Brennan’s IC report—and now, it’s undeniable. Sperry was right.
Tulsi Gabbard didn’t mince words. She slammed the whole thing as a “years-long coup against President Trump.”
She said that in the months before the 2016 election, intelligence experts believed Russia simply didn’t have the intent or capability to hack U.S. voting systems. But the narrative suddenly shifted after Trump’s victory.
On December 8, 2016, intel officials drafted an assessment for the President’s Daily Brief that concluded Russia “did not impact recent U.S. election results” through cyber attacks.
But that assessment never saw the light of day.
Tulsi revealed the shocking reason why: it was pulled at the last minute “based on new guidance.” It was effectively buried.
Why? Because Barack Obama didn’t like what it said.
According to Tulsi:
“The next day, top national security officials including FBI Dir James Comey, CIA Dir John Brennan and DNI James Clapper gathered at the Obama White House to discuss Russia. Obama directed the IC to create a new intelligence assessment that detailed Russian election meddling, even though it would contradict multiple intelligence assessments released over the previous several months.”
Let that sink in. Obama personally ordered a false report.
The final piece of the puzzle? Obama’s team weaponized their media allies—the Washington Post, New York Times, and reporters like Michael Isikoff—to spread the hoax far and wide. They leaked classified info to the press to ignite a national scandal.
Tulsi confirmed:
“According to whistleblower emails shared with us today, we know Clapper and Brennan used the baseless discredited Steele Dossier as a source to push this false narrative in the intelligence assessment.”
This is the biggest political scandal in modern U.S. history.
Barack Obama didn’t just let it happen—he led the charge.
