Joe Biden tried to use the law as a weapon to stop Donald Trump from becoming the next president in the future 2024 election.
But Biden and the Democratic Party as a whole, along with its media friends, might soon be in for a nasty shock.
WATCH: Church Leaders PRAYED you’d never see this…
One serious error might spell the end for Joe Biden’s case against Trump and force the court to throw out the entire thing.
Joe Biden wanted to see special counsel Jack Smith imprison Donald Trump, and he is actively carrying out that wish.
In the Mar-a-Lago document dispute, Smith has accused Trump of 37 offenses that could get him a total of 400 years in jail.
Will Scharf, a former federal prosecutor, believes that the case might never get to trial.
Scharf emphasized the serious accusations of prosecution malpractice made by Stanley Woodward, the lawyer for Walt Nauta, Trump’s co-defendant.
In a meeting with prosecutor Jay Bratt, according to Woodward, Bratt allegedly used the prospect of Woodward becoming a judge as leverage to persuade Nauta to turn against Trump and cooperate with the investigation.
In a column for The Federalist, Scharf makes the point that if Bratt’s misbehavior is shown, Judge Aileen Cannon should throw out the case against Trump and Nauta as a whole.
TRENDING: Little-Known Trick Clears Blurry Eyesight
“If Woodward’s claims are proven, U.S. District Judge Eileen Cannon would be well within her rights to consider a dismissal here. The conduct claimed is perhaps unprecedented and certainly flagrant, amounting to nothing less than an effort by a high-ranking DOJ official to deprive a defendant of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel through inappropriate and potentially unlawful acts,” Scharf wrote.
Bratt may have breached multiple laws, according to Scharf, who also cautioned that if these claims are confirmed, Bratt may be subject to legal repercussions.
“Make no mistake, this is a huge deal. Bratt’s conduct may even fall within the ambit of federal criminal statutes. Depending on what exactly was said, Bratt’s conduct could constitute attempted witness tampering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(b)(1), attempted federal bribery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 201(b)(3), attempted extortion by a federal official in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 872, or attempted subornation of perjury in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1622,” Scharf added.
From the Russia collusion lie to the Ukraine impeachment hoax, the pattern is consistent and reveals an unsettling reality about the investigators and the Deep State. They reject any restraints that should protect Americans from governmental overreach and misuse of power as they pursue Donald Trump with an obstinate pursuit that has no boundaries. The emphasis needs to be shifted to their fervent desire, which imperils the fundamental foundation of our democracy.
