>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
But instead of retreating or issuing an apology, the administration’s communications team responded with a message that suggested the backlash was exactly the reaction they expected.
Steven Cheung, a longtime spokesman for Donald Trump, fired back on X with a short reply that quickly spread across the platform.
“All these ‘singers’ keep falling for this,” Cheung wrote. “This just gives us more attention and more view counts to our videos because people want to see what they’re bitching about. Thank you for your attention to this matter.”
That last line has become a familiar phrase associated with Trump’s own social media style, adding an extra layer of mockery to the response.
The clash with Kesha is far from the first time the White House has tangled with high profile musicians over political messaging online.
Singer Sabrina Carpenter recently criticized an ICE themed social media video posted by the administration, calling the content “evil and disgusting.” Within days, the White House responded by posting a parody style clip that referenced her appearance on Saturday Night Live, sparking another round of viral reactions.
R&B artist SZA also joined the criticism after her song “Big Boy” was used in a separate immigration related video. She described the move as “evil and boring,” prompting a sharp response from Deputy Press Secretary Abigail Jackson, who blasted the singer publicly on social media.
Another pop star, Olivia Rodrigo, accused the administration of using her music as “racist, hateful propaganda.” In response, officials from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security suggested she should instead thank immigration agents working on the front lines.
The pattern has become clear. Each celebrity outburst appears to drive more attention to the very videos they are protesting.
Rather than shying away from criticism, the administration has leaned directly into the controversy, using the outrage itself as fuel for additional engagement online.
Political historians note that this approach represents a stark shift from how previous administrations handled similar disputes.
In the 1980s, Bruce Springsteen famously objected to Ronald Reagan referencing “Born in the U.S.A.” during campaign rallies. Reagan’s team ultimately stepped back from using the song.
Today’s political media environment appears to operate under a very different set of rules.
Instead of retreating when artists object, Trump’s political operation often responds by amplifying the conflict. Viral social media exchanges, celebrity outrage, and partisan reactions frequently generate millions of additional views.
The February 10 TikTok clip illustrates the strategy clearly.
Before Kesha commented publicly, the video had already accumulated roughly 14.5 million views and 1.8 million likes across platforms.
Once the singer began criticizing the post, millions more viewers reportedly searched for the clip to see what the controversy was about.
Those viewers were greeted with the same dramatic footage. Fighter jets blasting off a carrier deck. A warship exploding into flames. The word “Lethality” splashed across the screen.
For critics, it was inflammatory imagery. For supporters, it was simply a display of American military strength.
Either way, the attention surged.
And in the world of viral politics, attention is often the currency that matters most.
