>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
“Mr. Comey has been directed to appear, and I expect that he will,” Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche told Fox News. “The noise from MSNBC and from retired agents or unnamed anonymous sources about perp walks is just that. It’s just noise.”
Still, the rumors didn’t die easily. CBS News cited multiple law enforcement insiders claiming that FBI leadership did discuss a theatrical arrest, allegedly suggesting that Comey be taken into custody by “large, beefy agents in full kit,” wearing tactical vests and jackets clearly marked with the FBI logo.
The plan, according to CBS’s sources, was reportedly organized by a supervisory special agent from the Washington Field Office’s violent crimes division. That agent refused to participate, calling the idea “inappropriate and highly unusual” for a white-collar defendant like Comey.
The refusal didn’t go over well. The agent was suspended for insubordination, sparking outrage within parts of the Bureau. Several others have reportedly declined to take part in the arrest operation as well, deepening divisions within the FBI’s ranks.
Even as Comey’s legal team agreed to bring him to court voluntarily, internal FBI discussions about forcibly hauling him in continued behind closed doors, according to sources familiar with the situation.
The indictment followed weeks of chaos inside the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia, where the case originated. The office’s lead prosecutor, Erik Siebert, resigned just two weeks before the grand jury vote. Soon after, President Donald Trump appointed his former attorney, Lindsey Halligan, to lead the office — and within days, Halligan brought the Comey case before the grand jury.
CBS also reported that a memo circulated internally urging against the charges, but Halligan pressed forward. Two senior prosecutors were fired in the weeks leading up to the indictment, adding to the perception of a deep internal struggle over whether Comey should face criminal accountability.
The charges stem from Comey’s testimony where he denied authorizing anyone at the FBI to act as an anonymous source for news stories about the Hillary Clinton email investigation. Prosecutors now claim that denial was false — though the indictment does not specify which leaks Comey allegedly approved.
Comey has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing, insisting his statements were truthful.
The former FBI director’s arraignment has reignited deep partisan divides across Washington. Supporters of President Trump see the charges as long-overdue justice for a man they view as a symbol of the weaponized bureaucracy. Meanwhile, Comey’s defenders call it a politically motivated prosecution designed to punish one of Trump’s fiercest critics.
Either way, the spectacle of the FBI at war with itself over how to arrest its former leader has thrown the agency into a new credibility crisis. The Bureau’s handling of the Comey case will likely be scrutinized for months — and could set the tone for how far the Justice Department is willing to go to prove that no one, not even the former FBI director, is above the law.
