>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
“I hope it’s random, but we’re going to know in the next week and a half,” Trump said. “Pretty serious.”
The White House followed up with a more formal statement. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed that multiple federal agencies, including the FBI, are now coordinating efforts to examine whether any connections exist across the cases.
“In light of the recent and legitimate questions about these troubling cases and President Trump’s commitment to the truth, the White House is actively working with all relevant agencies and the FBI to holistically review all of the cases together and identify any potential commonalities that may exist,” Leavitt said.
“No stone will be unturned in this effort, and the White House will provide updates when we have them.”
Eskridge’s death itself remains officially classified as a self-inflicted gunshot wound. She passed away on June 11, 2022, at just 34 years old. However, limited public disclosure surrounding the circumstances has fueled ongoing questions, particularly given her controversial research and public statements prior to her death.
She was known as a co-founder of the Institute for Exotic Science and had spoken openly about her work on unconventional propulsion technologies, including claims related to “antigravity.”
In a 2020 interview with YouTuber Jeremy Rys, Eskridge described facing significant backlash after bringing her work into the public eye.
“We discovered antigravity, and our lives went to (expletive) and people started sabotaging us,” she said. “It’s harassment, threats. It’s awful.”
Her warnings went further, painting a picture of what she believed to be escalating danger tied to her research.
“If you stick your neck out in public, at least someone notices if your head gets chopped off,” Eskridge added. “If you stick your neck out in private, they will bury you. They will burn down your house while you’re sleeping in your bed, and it won’t even make the news.”
In the same interview, she suggested that publishing her findings was not just a professional goal, but a necessity for her safety.
“I have to publish because it’s only going to get worse until I publish,” she said, adding that the situation was “getting more and more aggressive.”
Her name is now being grouped alongside several others with ties to high-level research institutions and defense-related work. Among them are individuals linked to NASA, Los Alamos, and advanced academic programs, all of whom have reportedly died or gone missing in recent years.
Despite the growing attention, federal agencies are urging caution.
The National Nuclear Security Administration acknowledged awareness of reports involving personnel connected to its facilities but stopped short of confirming any pattern or wrongdoing.
“NNSA is aware of reports related to employees of our labs, plants and sites and is looking into the matter,” the agency stated.
At this stage, there is no publicly verified evidence connecting Eskridge’s death to any broader series of incidents. Authorities have not indicated that her research played a role in her passing, and many of the circulating claims remain unproven.
Still, the convergence of sensitive careers, unanswered questions, and repeated tragedies has intensified calls for transparency.
Whether this is a coincidence or something far more concerning is now the question looming over Washington.
For now, officials say answers are coming. But for many watching closely, the clock is already ticking.
