According to ATF leakers, the Biden administration is preparing to impose a severe ban on private gun sales in advance of the 2024 presidential election, which might pose a serious danger to the 2nd Amendment in American history.
President of Empower Oversight Tristan Leavitt claims that the ATF has written a 1,300-page paper defending a regulation that would “effectively” prohibit the sale of any private weapons at the Biden White House’s request.
Don’t miss this! Carry faith with you everywhere with the Exclusive National Prayer Coin!
Joe Biden signed an executive order on March 14, 2023, to “clarify the definition of who is engaged in the business of dealing in firearms, and thus required to become Federal firearms licensees (FFLs), in order to increase compliance with the Federal background check requirement for firearm sales.” The goal was to get America as close to having background checks for everyone as feasible without passing new laws.
The proposed regulation, led by Senior Policy Counsel Eric Epstein, would require background checks for all private weapon sales, which poses a serious danger to the 2nd Amendment, as The Federalist noted. Epstein is leading this contentious project; he was the Division Counsel during Operation Wide Receiver.
Leavitt points out that this regulation supersedes the Constitution’s clause on the separation of powers in addition to being against the Second Amendment. This gives the President the responsibility to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed,” while also granting Congress “all legislative Powers.”
Gun owners have historically been the target of the Biden administration. According to a revelation published in The Gateway Pundit last year, the ATF imposed a regulation that prohibited millions of firearms, and gun owners who disobeyed the law might face up to ten years in jail.
Concerns raised by Gun Owners of America (GOA) were raised when the administration announced plans to increase the size of the ATF’s illegal firearms register.
ALERT! Major Water Restrictions In Effect!
What stops the government from implementing this regulation even if the courts reject it?
