>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
Despite Younger’s evidence and impassioned pleas, a Dallas jury in 2019 granted him equal custody. However, in 2021, restrictions against unilateral transitioning were lifted when California introduced its “sanctuary state” policies for gender-affirming care. As a result, Younger was left powerless to prevent Georgulas from pursuing medical interventions, including hormone treatments and surgical procedures.
The judicial system has presented numerous challenges to Younger. He accused Texas Judge Mary Brown of disregarding evidence and expert testimony. “The Supreme Court of Texas denied my Mandamus, effectively terminating my parental rights,” Younger said. “My children are now subject to being chemically castrated in California. Texas is an empire of child abuse, led by Texas judges.”
Once the case moved to California, Younger’s situation worsened. He alleged that the Los Angeles court system displayed clear bias, citing instances of lost case files and restricted access to case documents. Judge Michelle Kazadi reportedly sealed case information from public view, while a July ransomware attack further complicated access to records.
Anne Georgulas, meanwhile, argued in court that James expressed an interest in transitioning. She cited an opinion from psychologist Brigid Mariko Conn, who recommended puberty blockers, estrogen, and potential surgical procedures. However, critics pointed out that James was diagnosed by an “LGBTQIAS2+” social worker months after Georgulas had filed her motion, raising questions about the objectivity of the assessment.
Despite these concerns, the court sided with Georgulas, permanently stripping Younger of his parental rights and granting her full control over James’s transition. Younger must now pay $5,000 monthly to fund James’s counseling and transition expenses, a financial burden that has only compounded his frustration.
In a social media post, Younger bid an emotional farewell to his sons, writing, “I lost all parental rights to my sons. Goodbye, boys. Perhaps, we will meet when you are adults.” He also addressed the issue of supervised visitation, arguing that it is harmful for both children and fathers. “Supervised visitation reinforces in a child’s mind that the father is dangerous, that something is wrong with him.”
What are the best concealed carry holsters for ultimate security?
Younger explained that the cost of traveling to Los Angeles for supervised visits was prohibitive, amounting to over $2,000 per trip. “No parent should do supervised visitation. It’s bad for the children, bad for the father, and allows courts to invent false findings to further endanger the father,” he said.
Younger has urged other fathers to avoid the family court system, which he claims is biased against men. “Let my story be a cautionary one for young men. Fathers have no rights to their children,” he wrote.
The case has sparked outrage among conservatives and family advocates, who see it as emblematic of larger issues within the family court system and the growing debate over medical transitions for minors. With California’s stance on gender-affirming care unlikely to change soon, this story serves as a chilling reminder of the legal and emotional toll such cases take on families.
