Numerous shaky and insignificant instances may be brought, but ultimately, the truth will win out.
Introducing the most recent advancement in the dubious Florida case that aims to thwart President Trump’s election by violating the 14th Amendment.
Secret government manifestation pill đź’Š?
TOSSED!
Celebrate a win for justice and the truth.
Laura Loomer recently tweeted an elegant explanation of the case’s theory.
UST IN: A man named Lawrence Caplan has filed a lawsuit in federal court to demand that President
@realDonaldTrump
REMOVED AND DISQUALIFIED from the 2024 presidential election as well as prohibited by the 14th Amendment from being on the ballot in the state of Florida.
According to Caplan, a self-described citizen of South Florida, President Trump’s eligibility to run for president of the United States in the 2024 election is in doubt because of his alleged involvement in an uprising.
Judge ultimately threw out Mr. Lawrence Caplan’s case.
The news was initially announced by The Palm Beach Post:
A lawsuit challenging Donald Trump’s 14th Amendment eligibility to run for president in 2024 was dismissed by a federal court in Fort Lauderdale.
Concerns concerning Trump’s eligibility to appear on the ballot for the Florida presidential primary have recently been raised by a lawsuit. His claimed involvement in the violence that took place at the U.S. is the reason for this complaint. on January 6th, Capitol.
Obama administration appointee Judge Robin Rosenberg promptly threw out the case without addressing whether Trump is covered by the 14th Amendment. Lawrence Caplan, a lawyer from Boynton Beach, was among the plaintiffs, but Rosenberg said they lacked the authority to file the case.
In Georgia, Donald Trump enters a not guilty plea. According to a recent declaration by Rosenberg, the plaintiffs do not have the authority to contest Trump’s eligibility for the office of President. Additionally, it is determined that the plaintiffs’ injuries from the Capitol Hill event, which occurred more than two years ago, are unrelated and irrelevant.
Rosenberg has underlined that a single citizen does not have the legal authority to question another’s eligibility for public office. She explicitly referred to two earlier court rulings where plaintiffs had been unsuccessful in trying to have candidates removed from the ballot as a result of their participation in the events of January 6 in Washington, D.C.
Donald Trump, a former president, speaks to reporters at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport about his opinions on his most recent lawsuit. The prospective standing-based challenge was mentioned by Trump’s attorney, Caplan, in a subsequent interview with the USA TODAY-Florida network. Caplan thinks that the case might be called into doubt because of his lack of eligibility and inability to tangibly show harm.
There was more in The Western Journal:
Lawrence Caplan, another Palm Beach attorney, and the other two declined to comment after the decision. Caplan previously stated his opinion that the Constitution forbids Trump from seeking re-election. He admitted that his lawsuit would face a serious obstacle in the form of the standing question.
“The 14th Amendment is very clear that you do not need a conviction. You need to be accused and obviously there has to be a rationale for the accusation,” Caplan said. “I read the amendment and I read the facts of the indictment, and they match very closely.”
By answering this survey, you will get free news updates from The Western Journal. any moment to decline. Your privacy and compliance with our privacy policy and terms of use are important to us.
Earlier attempts to argue that the 14th Amendment could bar some candidates from contesting the outcome of the 2020 election failed in court.
Following the Civil War, an amendment was ratified that reads as follows: “No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.”
The intention was crystal clear: to bar former public officials who supported the Confederacy from running for major offices unless Congress granted them the right by a two-thirds vote.
I’d like to congratulate President Trump on his important victory!
Excellent choice that led to a major win.
Caplan was recently the subject of an article by Laura Loomer on her Substack website.
Democrat political operative and South Florida tax attorney Lawrence Caplan has filed a lawsuit contesting President Trump’s ability to run for office in 2024. Trump’s involvement in the events of January 6, 2021, according to Caplan, helps his position under the 14th Amendment, notably Section 3. It’s vital to remember that the 14th Amendment’s “disqualification clause” was created in response to the Civil War with the goal of excluding anybody who sided with the Confederacy from holding office. On August 24, 2023, Caplan filed a lawsuit, the day before President Trump was taken into custody in Fulton County, Georgia. The lawsuit, however, contains erroneous information as well as a number of grammatical and spelling mistakes, including an incorrect address. Anyone who has participated in insurrection or rebellion against the government is unable to hold office, according to the 14th Amendment.
In his complaint, Caplan claimed:
“The bottom line here is that President Trump both engaged in an insurrection and also gave aid and comfort to other individuals who were engaging in such actions, within the clear meaning of those terms as defined in Section Three of the 14th Amendment. Assuming that the public record to date is accurate, and we have no evidence to the contrary, Trump is no longer eligible to seek the office of the President of the United States, or of any other state of the Union.”
In response to the complaint, a representative for the President Trump campaign said,
“We look forward to its prompt dismissal, to an award of legal sanctions against the plaintiff and to receiving full payment from him of all of our legal fees responding to this meritless, bad faith case.”
Caplan, who has a history of filing lawsuits to try to sway American presidential elections, gained notoriety in 2000. His intended victim was none other than Dick Cheney, whose hurried Wyoming voter registration raised questions. As a long-time Dallas taxpayer and voter, Cheney, according to Caplan, was unable to cast a ballot in Wyoming. However, a federal judge in Dallas dismissed Caplan’s lawsuit.
Caplan actively sought to influence upcoming presidential elections after his legal defeat. His “Operation Snowbird” internet effort, launched in the wake of the 2000 presidential election, was designed to persuade out-of-state voters from historically Democratic areas, particularly New York and New Jersey, to cast their ballots in Florida. Caplan wanted to test his hypothesis that Al Gore may have won the 2000 election if these transient Florida residents had cast their votes in the state. He encouraged part-time Florida residents, also known as snowbirds, to change their voter registration to Florida. In that election, the Bush/Cheney ticket won Florida by a razor-thin margin of just 537 votes. Caplan had previously stated that he would consider it a major victory if he could persuade 10,000 voters to change their minds.
Legal experts believe Caplan’s present lawsuit has very little chance of success because there is no established precedence for this kind of situation. President Trump has not been found guilty of encouraging or taking part in an uprising, and neither have any of the defendants from the events of January 6th. Caplan’s lawsuit appears to be more of a publicity stunt and political gimmick than a serious legal argument.
Caplan is an attorney with expertise in offshore trusts and the President of the Sequoia Group, a Florida-based Offshore and Domestic Asset Protection Specialist Company. He has experience offshore investing and minimizing tax obligations in addition to his legal job. Notably, Caplan has a Florida law license but just had his California license banned for failing to pay fees.
“The bottom line here is that President Trump both engaged in an insurrection and also gave aid and comfort to other individuals who were engaging in such actions,” God, Caplan is so stupid. They were unarmed, Trump told them to go there peacefully, and he offered National Guard support — that Pelosi turned down. And those that entered the Capitol often entered peacefully, often were invited in, moved often under escort.
JUSTICE PREVAILS
Congratulations President Trump
God bless you and our nation