>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
Sutton dismissed the complaint, citing DOJ reliance on a Federalist report about the closed-door conference. He argued that “recycling allegations without direct sources doesn’t corroborate them,” and repeated unverified statements rarely justify misconduct charges.
In plain terms, unless someone records what federal judges say behind closed doors, they can allegedly plan obstruction with no consequences.
White House Supports Impeachment Push
Despite the appeals court ruling, the White House is doubling down on efforts to hold Boasberg accountable. A White House official told Fox News, “Left-wing activist judges have gone totally rogue, undermining the rule of law in service of their radical agenda.”
The official added that such actions must stop, and the administration fully supports impeachment inquiries.
House Speaker Mike Johnson has publicly backed these efforts, emphasizing the need to hold activist judges accountable. Republicans have filed impeachment articles against Boasberg twice—first in March 2025 over the deportation case and again in November related to the Arctic Frost investigation, where he approved secret warrants targeting Republican congressmen.
Texas Congressman Brandon Gill introduced the initial articles, labeling Boasberg a “rogue judge who weaponized the judiciary against Trump’s constitutional authority.” Appeals court rulings won’t change GOP determination to pursue impeachment.
Boasberg’s Role in Halting Deportations
Appointed to the federal bench by President Obama in 2010, Boasberg became chief judge of the D.C. federal district court in 2023. This positioned him to obstruct Trump’s policies during the former president’s second term.
Boasberg blocked Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act—a law from 1798—to deport members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, who had invaded U.S. communities, terrorizing residents with rape, murder, and organized crime.
Even as deportation flights were airborne, Boasberg ordered them turned around. Trump officials argued the planes had already left U.S. airspace when the written order arrived. El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele confirmed the planes landed regardless, posting on social media: “Oopsie…too late” with a crying-laughing emoji.
Boasberg claimed Trump’s team violated his orders and suggested criminal contempt proceedings. Essentially, he expected planes to be diverted mid-flight—a virtually impossible demand—and punished the administration when it didn’t comply.
A History of Judicial Overreach
Boasberg has a long record of controversial rulings. He oversaw Jack Smith’s investigations into Trump, signing secret warrants to seize phone records from Republican congressmen without proper scrutiny. Even when officials admitted he likely didn’t know lawmakers were targeted, he approved the actions.
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts defended Boasberg in March 2025, arguing that impeachment isn’t appropriate for judicial disagreements and that the normal appellate process should be used—a process that often takes months or years while dangerous criminals remain free.
The Judicial Protection Racket Exposed
The appeals court ruling highlights a systemic problem: judges meet in secret, coordinate opposition to lawful policies, then shield themselves from accountability using “lack of evidence” excuses. Boasberg’s obstruction of deportations, combined with his alleged pre-meeting comments, exemplifies this pattern.
The White House’s push for impeachment is therefore justified. When judges abuse power to block deportations and are protected by their peers, the constitutional remedy is removal from office. With Republican control of the Senate, Congress now has the authority to investigate and hold Boasberg accountable.
The appeals court’s dismissal makes one thing clear: the judicial misconduct process often protects judges rather than enforcing the law. Impeachment is the only path left when judges act as political actors, and Boasberg’s record confirms he has consistently acted in defiance of lawful executive authority.
