The revelation has sparked questions because California law requires voters to register using their actual residence. Los Angeles County guidelines are clear: voters must register where they live and sign documentation affirming that information under penalty of perjury.
The address in question, Suite 600 at 9200 Sunset Boulevard, is not a residential property. Instead, it serves as the business office of financial manager Michael Ullman, whose company, Platinum Financial Management, represents numerous entertainment industry clients.
According to the Daily Mail investigation, the office address appears on voter registration records connected to several well-known celebrities. The list reportedly includes Jennifer Aniston, Jenna Dewan, Linda Cardellini, Katheryn Winnick, Nicollette Sheridan, Laura Harrier, Matt Czuchry, Debbie Gibson, and Hamish Linklater, among others.
The situation immediately drew scrutiny because the address functions as a business office rather than a residence.
Ullman himself acknowledged that the celebrities do not actually live there.
“They don’t live here,” he told the Mail.
“It’s just a mailing address, but it’s not their residential address. So it gets mailed here, but they voted in their area.”
That explanation, however, may not resolve the legal questions.
Election law attorney Amber Hulse of the Dhillon Law Group told the publication that California law allows voters to receive mail at alternate addresses, but that does not replace the requirement to disclose an actual residence.
“You’re allowed to use a mailing address, like a business address or something like that,” Hulse explained.
“But they still need to provide their residential address as their domicile. If, for example, Jennifer Aniston is using it as her residence, when it is clearly not her residence, then it would be illegal.”
She further noted the legal consequences that could arise if false information was knowingly submitted.
“When you sign up to register to vote, you’re signing under penalty of perjury. It would be the crime of perjury in California.”
Los Angeles County’s own voter information guidelines reinforce that point, stating: “A person may only register to vote at their place of residence. A business address or a P.O. Box number may only be used as a mailing address.”
Hulse also addressed the privacy concerns often cited by public figures.
“People can hide their residential address for privacy concerns, but celebrity is not one of those options,” Hulse said.
The Daily Mail reported that voter registrations connected to the address stretch back more than two decades. Director Campion Murphy reportedly registered there as far back as 2002. Jenna Dewan was listed as the most recent registration tied to the office, dating to December 2025.
Records reviewed by the publication showed that Jennifer Aniston was registered at the address as recently as January 29, 2025. The actress has been a vocal supporter of Democratic candidates, including former President Joe Biden and former Vice President Kamala Harris.
Some observers may argue that 36 registrations represent only a tiny number of voters in a state as large as California. Critics, however, say the issue is larger than the raw numbers.
Election laws governing residency exist for a reason. Different cities and jurisdictions elect different officials, levy different taxes, and vote on different local measures. Registering in the wrong location could potentially allow someone to participate in elections where they do not actually reside.
Hulse emphasized that point during her interview.
“The entire point of making people disclose their domicile is so that only people that are actual residents of these political subdivisions are actually voting in the election for people that would represent them,” Hulse said.
“For example, if you live in LA County, you should have no business in electing someone in San Diego County.”
The controversy arrives amid ongoing national debates over voter roll accuracy, election security, and enforcement of existing laws. Conservatives have long argued that election safeguards should be strengthened and that violations should be investigated regardless of the political affiliation or celebrity status of those involved.
Meanwhile, Los Angeles County officials say the matter remains under review.
County spokesman Michael Sanchez stated that authorities are “continuing to review the records associated with this address.”
He added that election officials generally process registrations when applicants certify their information under penalty of perjury and otherwise satisfy state requirements.
“If a voter attests under penalty of perjury that an address constitutes their residence or domicile, and the registration otherwise meets legal requirements, the registration is processed in accordance with state law,” Sanchez said.
As of now, none of the celebrities named in the report have publicly addressed the allegations or commented on the ongoing review.
Whether the investigation ultimately uncovers administrative errors, misunderstandings, or more serious violations, the episode has once again fueled concerns among election integrity advocates who argue that voter registration laws should be enforced equally for every American — including Hollywood’s biggest stars.
