>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
The Obama administration, Gabbard says, didn’t just push a narrative—they created it.
Fox News continued: “The Obama administration ‘manufactured and politicized intelligence’ to create the narrative that Russia was attempting to influence the 2016 presidential election, despite information from the intelligence community stating otherwise.”
Gabbard didn’t mince words.
“The information we are releasing today clearly shows there was a treasonous conspiracy in 2016 committed by officials at the highest level of our government,” Gabbard told Fox News Digital.
She added:
“Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup with the objective of trying to usurp the President from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people.”
These documents, now circulating widely, were also shared by independent journalist Greg Price, revealing what many suspected for years: the so-called “Russia collusion” narrative was an elaborate setup orchestrated from within the Oval Office.
Let that sink in. High-ranking officials, possibly including the president himself, allegedly twisted intelligence to smear a duly elected leader and overturn the results of an American election. If that’s not the very definition of a coup, what is?
The establishment media will inevitably try to spin this as old news, partisan bickering, or another distraction. But even Democrats have previously raised concerns about Obama’s outsized influence behind the scenes. Whether it was his involvement in selecting Biden’s running mate or his rumored attempts to steer the direction of the party post-2016, Obama’s fingerprints have been found all over major political shifts—and not always for the better.
Recent reports have even hinted that Obama may be meddling in the 2024 election cycle, particularly when it comes to nudging Joe Biden aside and keeping Kamala Harris in play despite her dismal popularity. It’s not the first time accusations of power-brokering have been thrown his way. But now, thanks to Gabbard, those concerns are no longer just speculative—they’re backed by hard evidence.
Gabbard’s revelations don’t just target a failed smear campaign; they expose an ideology that treats voters like obstacles and elections like mere suggestions. When unelected bureaucrats and ex-presidents work to undo the will of the people, democracy becomes theater—and the actors wear familiar faces.
This is more than a political scandal. It’s a constitutional crisis that deserves the full attention of every American who cares about liberty, fairness, and the rule of law. The only question now: who will be held accountable?
Tulsi Gabbard has thrown down the gauntlet. The truth is out. Will justice follow?
