“No, there’s no client list and never has been a client list. A client list suggests that Jeffrey Epstein made a list of people to whom he trafficked women,” Dershowitz explained. “What there is, is a redacted FBI affidavit from accusers.”
The redacted documents, he said, include names that have been blacked out — but those names, contrary to popular belief, don’t belong to current public officeholders.
“I can tell you right now: None of them are public figures who are currently in office. Some of them were previously in office. Some of them are dead,” he said.
The real roadblock to transparency, Dershowitz argues, lies within the judicial system. Two judges in Manhattan, he claims, are suppressing the full release of documents in an effort to protect alleged victims.
“Many of the things that are being suppressed are being suppressed by two judges in Manhattan… and they’re doing it largely to protect the alleged accusers,” he revealed.
Because of these judicial orders, Dershowitz says he’s legally prevented from disclosing the full extent of what he knows, even though he personally conducted investigations and is aware of all the individuals involved.
“I know who all these people are. I could figure out, based on everything that I saw, who Mr. X is, Mr. Y is, and Mr. Z,” he said. “The redactions could be undone if you go to court.”
Another bombshell revelation from Dershowitz: The vast majority of names linked to Epstein have already been exposed, just not widely reported.
“The vast majority of people who are in the files — and I know them all, I’ve seen all the names — the vast, vast majority of them have already been disclosed. They’re in articles all over the world. They’re in books that have been written.”
The problem, he said, is that the media hasn’t done its homework in connecting the dots or highlighting names already out in the open.
“If we got everything, everything, you would be shocked how few names are there that haven’t already been disclosed,” he said.
WATCH:
Backing up Dershowitz’s statements is David Schoen, another former Epstein lawyer who represented him just before his death in 2019. In a post on X, Schoen directly debunked the left’s favorite talking point — that Trump was somehow involved.
“I can say authoritatively, unequivocally, and definitively that he had no information to hurt President Trump. I specifically asked him!” Schoen said.
He added that Epstein had consulted him for months before officially hiring him just nine days before his sudden death behind bars. According to Schoen, Trump’s name was never brought up as a liability.
This latest revelation throws a massive wrench into the narrative pushed by anti-Trump outlets. Despite repeated attempts to link Trump to Epstein’s criminal activities, actual legal professionals directly involved in the case are now coming forward and saying it just isn’t true.
Dershowitz’s and Schoen’s testimonies pull the rug out from under the conspiracy theories that have saturated social media and cable news. Their comments paint a very different picture — one in which it’s the courts, not Trump, that are stonewalling the release of vital information. And as it turns out, much of what’s being hidden is already public — the media just hasn’t bothered to cover it.
While the Left continues chasing shadows, facts are slowly emerging — and those facts seem to exonerate Trump while pointing fingers in entirely different directions. The real scandal might not be what’s hidden, but who is choosing to ignore what’s already out there.
