>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
The implications of such a move would be enormous. Iran relies heavily on desalination systems to provide clean drinking water to its population, which exceeds 90 million people. Any disruption to those facilities could trigger widespread humanitarian consequences almost immediately.
International law experts have also raised serious concerns. Under the Geneva Convention, attacks on civilian infrastructure essential to survival — including water and power systems — are strictly prohibited, potentially placing such actions in violation of long-standing global agreements.
At the same time, Tehran is weighing a major decision of its own. Iranian officials have floated the possibility of withdrawing from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, a pact the country has long cited as proof it is not pursuing nuclear weapons. A move to exit the agreement would mark a dramatic shift and could further inflame already high tensions.
Despite those claims, U.S. intelligence agencies have consistently warned that Iran’s uranium enrichment activities could eventually position the country to develop a nuclear weapon if left unchecked.
Iranian officials have pushed back strongly against Western pressure. An Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson questioned the value of remaining in the agreement, stating: “What is the benefit of joining a treaty in which bullying parties at the international level not only do not allow us to benefit from its rights but also attack our nuclear facilities?”
Financial markets reacted sharply to the conflicting signals. Early optimism over a potential deal sent futures higher, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average rising 357 points, or 0.8%. Both the S&P 500 and Nasdaq futures followed suit, each climbing by roughly the same margin.
At the same time, oil prices surged amid fears of supply disruptions. Brent crude jumped to $115 per barrel, while U.S. crude climbed past $101, reflecting growing anxiety over the stability of global energy flows.
Trump’s timing has not gone unnoticed by critics. Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf accused the former president of attempting to influence markets with strategically timed statements.
“Heads-up: Pre-market so-called “news” or “Truth” is often just a setup for profit-taking. Basically, it’s a reverse indicator. Do the opposite: If they pump it, short it. If they dump it, go long,” he posted on X.
Meanwhile, some voices within the military community are urging caution. Retired U.S. Army General Wesley Clark warned that targeting civilian infrastructure could cross a serious legal and moral line.
“A lot of people will say it’s a war crime because mostly these power plants are probably there for the civilian population,” Clark said in a NewsNation interview. “You cannot destroy civilian assets in an effort to put harm on the population.”
As Washington reportedly moves additional troops into the region, concerns about a broader conflict continue to grow. Iran, for its part, is reinforcing key strategic assets, including Kharg Island — a critical hub responsible for handling roughly 90% of the nation’s oil exports.
With both sides signaling resolve and little indication of backing down, the situation remains volatile — and the world is watching closely as events unfold.
