>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
Here’s the unbelievable quote from the judge’s ruling:
Noem “threatens to: inflict irreparable harm on hundreds of thousands of persons whose lives, families, and livelihoods will be severely disrupted, cost the United States billions in economic activity, and injure public health and safety in communities throughout the United States.”
Let that sink in. Chen argues that keeping 350,000 undocumented Venezuelans here benefits the U.S. economy—despite the billions already being drained from local governments trying to house, feed, and process waves of migrants. According to his logic, enforcing immigration law is more harmful than ignoring it altogether.
There was no mention of the skyrocketing costs to taxpayers. No mention of the criminal activity plaguing communities. No concern for the rising tension in sanctuary cities now buckling under the weight of migrant surges. Instead, Judge Chen expects Americans to believe that mass illegal immigration is some kind of economic stimulus.
And who exactly is feeding him this narrative? One can’t help but wonder if groups like George Soros’s Open Society are behind this latest effort to undermine national sovereignty. It’s certainly not the will of the American people, who have made it clear they want borders secured and lawbreakers held accountable.
Raise a Toast with the Bulletproof Trump Whiskey Glass – A Patriotic Statement Piece
Conservative voice and former Trump advisor Stephen Miller weighed in, blasting the decision as another example of radical judicial activism getting in the way of common-sense immigration policy.
It’s decisions like these that remind voters why Trump’s return to the White House is more important than ever. With an army of activist judges waiting to block any attempt to restore order, the battle for America’s future is not just in the White House—it’s in the courtroom, too.
If a single judge in California can override immigration enforcement for hundreds of thousands, what’s next?
