Representing Donald Trump’s Save America PAC, attorney Alina Habba, takes issue with Special Counsel Jack Smith’s expeditious efforts to take the federal criminal case pertaining to the 2020 election and Trump’s immunity defense all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Trump faces criminal charges for participating in plots to rig the 2020 election. charges are dropped due to presidential immunity.
Don’t miss this! Carry faith with you everywhere with the Exclusive National Prayer Coin!
Smith takes the case to the highest court in the land, emphasizing the impending Trump trial on March 4 and calling for prompt action before to the D.C. Circuit’s ruling. With the Supreme Court’s consent, Trump must reply by December 20. The case’s conclusion will be determined by their discussions.
“There is some sort of real sense of urgency,” stated in an interview Habba. “The only urgency that I can see is that there is an election in November 2024, and they can’t beat him.”
What Smith is doing, according to Habba, “everyone can see,” and it “is election interference at its finest.”
“They can’t beat him in the ballots, so they’re going to have to either, you know, lie, cheat, steal, or the newest, lawfare, put him in jail, tie him up,” She informed Larry Kudlow of Fox Business Network.
Given that Trump would have to travel to the trial every day, Kudlow feels that he shouldn’t be running for office.
Habba nodded and murmured, “It’s actually playing against them.”
“He’s getting a lot of voters that he normally wouldn’t get because they’re seeing this and he is the victim of, all of a sudden they’ve made him a victim of complete and utter election interference and lawfare,” she said.
Habba expressed her confidence in the Supreme Court due of their “really take their office seriously, and we’ve seen that time and time again with that, especially recently.”
ALERT! Major Water Restrictions In Effect!
Special counsel Jack Smith is being criticized by the lawyer for Trump’s Save America PAC for questionable legal actions in the Jan. 6 election meddling case.
Attorney Christina Bobb spoke to Eric Bolling of Newsmax TV: “That’s very right. It’s a playbook that Jack Smith has done before; he’s trying to do the same thing to Donald Trump that he did to Bob McDonnell in Virginia. And this appeal must go as quickly as it possibly can for Jack Smith to keep the timeline, to be able to do exactly what he did with Bob McDonnell.”
The legal teams for Smith and Trump have pushed their cases to the highest courts in an intense legal struggle. While Trump’s attorneys have moved on with the Appeals Court for the District of Columbia, Smith has filed an emergency appeal with the United States Supreme Court. Their shared objective is to ascertain if Trump’s presidential activities grant him protection from prosecution. The Supreme Court has amazingly agreed to consider Smith’s case, opening the door for an important ruling.
Find out how Bobb reveals a significant mistake made by Smith, the former chief of the public integrity unit at the Department of Justice. This team gained notoriety after it found former Republican governor of Virginia Bob McDonnell guilty of bribery and extortion. But there’s more! In a unanimous ruling in 2016, the Supreme Court intervened and reversed the conviction. Discover the whole tale right now.
“He rammed through a conviction. It gets overturned eight to zero on appeal. Right. He’s exonerated, but in the meantime, the election took place and interfered with that exactly. That’s what he’s trying to do. Yep,” Bobb told Bolling.
She expressed worry about the defense’s lack of knowledge on the high court appeal.
“What information did they get? Where did they get it? How did they get it? Was there a subpoena involved? Was there a FISA court involved?” She inquired, adding that the defense need access to information on Smith’s activities before to the trial, which was set for March 4. However, Tanya Chutkan, the federal judge presiding over the case, issued an order on Wednesday postponing it until the appeals were resolved.
“This is a blatant violation of due process. That’s depriving the president of an opportunity to provide a meaningful defense when they don’t even know what this information is,” Robb continued.
She said with confidence that the matter may be dropped on the grounds of presidential immunity, a constitutional precept that broadly shields the president’s conduct.
“It [Supreme Court] should dismiss the case immediately. Presidential immunity is well established in our case law,” She said, expressing the opinion of visitor Peter Navarro.
There might be dire repercussions if presidential immunity is not maintained.
“If Jack Smith does get his wish on this, I think this is a very clear case of be careful what you wish for. Peter knows better than anybody how they’ve already obliterated executive privilege. And if they now obliterate presidential immunity, be very, very careful for the precedent you’re setting,” she told Bolling.
Smith received criticism from Trump’s campaign about his Supreme Court submission.
“Crooked Joe Biden’s henchman, Deranged Jack Smith, is so obsessed with interfering in the 2024 Presidential Election to prevent President Trump from retaking the Oval Office, as the President is poised to do, that Smith is willing to try for a Hail Mary by racing to the Supreme Court and attempting to bypass the appellate process,” stated a Trump representative.
“Deranged may need to be reminded that the Supreme Court has not been kind to him, including by handing down a rare unanimous rebuke when the Court overturned him 8-0 in the McDonnell case,” The spokesman continued.
This was a “extraordinary request,” according to Smith’s staff, in an “extraordinary case,” adding: “It is of imperative public importance that respondent’s claims of immunity be resolved by this Court and that respondent’s trial proceed as promptly as possible if his claim of immunity is rejected.”
