>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
Her name was missing from the official 1994 commencement program — an omission Sadler says could only mean she lied to investigators.
“She can say she covered for her classmates,” he added. “It wasn’t, ‘I’m not gonna say anything.’ It was lying about what she saw, lying about the details.”
How the Scandal Unfolded
The 1992 scandal became one of the darkest chapters in the Naval Academy’s history. Over 130 midshipmen were accused of obtaining stolen copies of an electrical engineering exam.
The Navy launched a full-scale criminal investigation under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Students who immediately came forward and admitted wrongdoing were expelled. Those who stayed silent or tried to hide their involvement often received lighter punishments when the investigation was later downgraded.
Sadler said that outcome sent “a very corrosive signal” to future officers. “Those that tried to avoid doing the honorable thing were able to stay and graduate and go off and get commissions,” he explained. “It sent a very corrosive signal to young officers that doing the honorable thing doesn’t pay.”
Sherrill Refuses to Release Records
Republican gubernatorial candidate Jack Ciattarelli and several GOP congressmen have demanded that Sherrill release her full academic and disciplinary records to clear the air.
“If those sealed disciplinary records match Representative Sherrill’s current explanation, we are unsure why she would refuse to release the records and put this matter to rest,” read a joint statement from Reps. Tom Kean Jr., Jeff Van Drew, and Chris Smith.
Sherrill’s campaign insists the attacks are politically motivated, calling Ciattarelli’s push “a desperate attempt to smear” her service. But her repeated refusal to unseal the records only fuels suspicion.
Her explanations have also shifted over time. At one point, she said, “I didn’t turn in some of my classmates.” Later she admitted, “There was a test at the school that was stolen. I did not realize it was stolen. I took the test.” Then after a recent debate, she appeared to change her story again: “There were hundreds of people in my class that spoke to investigators. When I did, I told them what I knew.”
Sadler isn’t buying it. “She’s trying to obscure and to evade,” he said.
The Lasting Stain of 1994
Sadler recalled that the entire Class of 1994 carried the stigma of the cheating scandal for decades.
“Instructors and chiefs would joke, ‘We’re going to make sure you don’t steal the test,’” he said. Even years later, fellow officers treated graduates from that class with extra scrutiny.
The scandal led to the resignation of Rear Admiral Thomas C. Lynch and prompted congressional hearings. Eighty-eight midshipmen were ultimately found guilty, and 24 were expelled.
For Sadler, Sherrill’s refusal to be fully transparent about her involvement shows she “still hasn’t learned to take accountability.”
“She immediately went back, and she defended the worst of the behavior in that scandal,” Sadler said. “That, in my estimation, is the violation that she’s committed here.”
A Test of Integrity in the Election
Sadler insists this isn’t about politics. “We should demand better of who leads us,” he said. “American citizens deserve and need better leadership because we’re in very dangerous times.”
The timing couldn’t be worse for Sherrill. Once leading comfortably in the polls, she’s now tied with Ciattarelli at 43% each, according to Emerson College.
Her military background has been the foundation of her political career — but the controversy over her honesty could destroy that narrative.
As Sadler’s allegations ripple through the state, New Jersey voters now face a critical question: will they believe Sherrill’s shifting story, or demand the transparency she’s fought so hard to avoid?
