>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
He told the reporter he backed Trump because “Democrats make me feel bad about who I am.”
That one sentence captured what piles of election data later confirmed. Trump won men by double digits, and he made historic gains with Hispanic and Black male voters.
Ham said what Democrats feared hearing.
“When I heard about that Latino prison guard, I thought: I bet that guy sees himself as very masculine,” Ham stated. “And a man who sees himself as very masculine is going to look at the current Democrat Party and be like, ‘They hate me.’ And that’s a reasonable conclusion.”
The Data Democrats Don’t Want to Talk About
NBC exit polls from 2024 weren’t just bad for Democrats. They were catastrophic. Trump took 55 percent of male voters to Harris’s 43 percent. Among white men, he blew the doors off at 60 to 38. And Democrats watched minority male support evaporate, with Trump winning 21 percent of Black men and nearly half of Hispanic men.
These weren’t small cracks in the coalition. These were structural failures.
A Party Captured by Ideological Activists
RealClearPolitics co-founder Tom Bevan joined Ham in noting the obvious: this wasn’t accidental.
“The Democrat Party has spent the better part of 10 or 20 years talking about how masculinity is toxic,” Bevan said.
And when Democrats finally realized in late 2024 that they had a male voter crisis, their solution was laughable. They launched the awkward and widely mocked “White Dudes for Harris” campaign, featuring men bragging about being “so masculine” they could supposedly eat mechanical parts for breakfast.
Instead of repairing relationships with working men, Democrats doubled down on cringe.
Institutional Hostility Toward Traditional Men
The war on masculinity wasn’t contained to political ads. In 2018, the American Psychological Association declared that attributes like stoicism, competitiveness, and dominance were harmful — a declaration that quickly spread across schools, HR departments, and newsrooms.
Democrats cheered as institutions reframed traditional masculinity as a defect, not a virtue. Then they acted shocked when men rejected them at the ballot box.
Ham did caution Republicans not to fall into a similar trap with young women, noting,
“If you only talk about young women as if they are overeducated, naggy, childless cat ladies, they will think you don’t want anything to do with them also.”
The difference, of course, is that Republicans are not spending decades declaring femininity inherently toxic.
Democrats Waste $20 Million Trying to Decode Men
Instead of learning the obvious, Democrats decided to spend a staggering $20 million on a project called “Speaking with American Men.”
According to the New York Times, the study aims to analyze “syntax, language and content that gains attention and virality” in male spaces. In other words, high-priced consultants will explain what Mary Katharine Ham spelled out in one sentence: stop attacking masculinity.
The study even encouraged Democrats to start dropping campaign ads into video games — because apparently the problem is simply locating men, not understanding them.
One commenter summed it up perfectly with a brutal reminder:
“Remember the month before the election and Democrats tried to relate to men? Now they’re trying again spending $20 million.”
Men Got the Message — Loud and Clear
Democrats made a choice years ago to embrace activist definitions of gender over the lived reality of working men across America. That choice now haunts them.
Men noticed the hostility.
Men heard the lectures.
And men voted accordingly.
Until Democrats stop treating masculinity as something broken that needs to be corrected, no amount of consultants, studies, or game ads will bring men back.
