>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
In the aftermath of her testimony, Gabbard was noticeably absent from recent high-level strategy meetings, including sessions in the Situation Room. While White House insiders insist her exclusion is unrelated, insiders close to the President aren’t so sure.
“Has she got all the requisite skills and background? No. But she’s somebody who has the ear of the president. I still believe she has [his] trust and confidence because we cannot give up,” Flynn stated.
Flynn, who briefly served as national security advisor during Trump’s first term after a long career in military intelligence, suspects a coordinated effort to undermine Gabbard before she gains her footing in one of the most sensitive roles in the federal government.
WATCH:
“I believe that particular testimony, where she talked about Iran not having nuclear weapons, to me… and I believe this, I’ll say it here: That was a setup,” Flynn said. “She’s only a couple of weeks into the job. She’s taken what the intel, the smartest people in our intelligence community, say about something, and she presents it. Until she can get in and figure out what’s going on and build a team around her that she can trust…”
According to Flynn, remnants of the Obama and Biden administrations still populate the ranks of the intelligence apparatus, and they’re not playing fair.
“Below the level of people at the top — the Cabinet officials, the couple of people who were put into the jobs — most of those people were put in by Obama, and then they were strengthened by the Biden administration,” Flynn revealed.
He went on to point out that the intelligence community has been quietly stacked with so-called “special government employees” — a designation used to bring in short-term federal personnel. Notably, Trump used the same designation to temporarily install Elon Musk into a government advisory role.
The implications of Flynn’s claim are far-reaching. If true, it suggests a deliberate campaign within the intelligence infrastructure to pit Gabbard and Trump against each other using bad information — all to prevent a realignment of foreign policy power under Trump’s second administration.
Benny Johnson didn’t hold back when reacting to Flynn’s theory: “It’s wild that you’re saying Tulsi Gabbard may have been given some incorrect information in order to create some frictions there.”
Flynn responded with personal experience: “It happened to me. When I was the director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, my testimony… came back, and the White House had changed it. They had wanted me to say a certain narrative that Obama was talking about at that time.”
That manipulation, Flynn says, led to his removal: “That’s why I was let go.”
In Washington, palace intrigue is nothing new. But if Flynn’s version of events holds water, it points to a deeper rot still embedded in America’s intelligence community — and a possible coordinated effort to kneecap Trump’s most unorthodox, and perhaps most dangerous, advisor: Tulsi Gabbard.
As this story continues to unfold, one thing is clear — the war within the deep state isn’t over. And Tulsi Gabbard may be the latest casualty in a long line of patriots caught in the crosshairs.
