>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
Puthoff’s background is not typical of fringe speculation. He previously worked on the CIA’s classified remote viewing initiative and later served as an advisor to the Pentagon’s Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program (AAWSAP), a $22 million effort tied to investigating advanced aerospace technologies and UAP-related cases, including those connected to Navy encounters.
According to longtime colleague Eric Davis, alleged descriptions circulating within those circles categorize four groups often referred to as Grays, Nordics, Reptilians, and Insectoids. Some researchers, including UFO author Kent Heckenlively, have gone further, claiming the so-called Insectoids—described as mantis-like beings—are sometimes portrayed by witnesses as hierarchical or “in charge” entities.
Taken together, these claims have reignited long-standing debates over whether classified programs have uncovered evidence of non-human intelligence.
But this is not an isolated revelation. It arrives after years of increasingly public testimony from military and intelligence figures.
In 2023, former Air Force intelligence officer David Grusch testified under oath before the House Oversight Committee. During that hearing, he asserted that the U.S. government possesses “non-human biologics” recovered from alleged crash sites.
When asked directly by Rep. Nancy Mace, “Were they human or non-human biologics?” Grusch replied:
“Biologics came with some of these recoveries, yeah.”
He further claimed he had interviewed dozens of individuals with direct program knowledge and had information on specific locations where recovered materials were allegedly stored. Grusch also warned about potential retaliation against whistleblowers who attempted to come forward.
The Defense Department has repeatedly denied such claims, maintaining that there is no verified evidence of extraterrestrial technology or biological materials in government possession.
Still, skepticism has not stopped renewed political attention.
Three weeks ago, the Trump administration reportedly launched a declassification initiative known as PURSUE—the Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP Encounters—posting previously classified material on a public government portal at war.gov/ufo.
Donald Trump reportedly encouraged the public to evaluate the situation themselves, stating, “WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON?”
Kash Patel described the effort as a “landmark release,” while Tulsi Gabbard said the intelligence community is conducting a broad, multi-agency declassification push involving UAP-related materials.
Supporters of transparency argue the pattern is becoming harder to dismiss. First came decades of official denials. Then came acknowledgments of classified programs like AAWSAP. Then came confirmed Navy UAP footage. Then sworn congressional testimony alleging recovered materials and biologics. Now comes renewed public disclosure efforts paired with senior insiders speaking more openly.
UFO researcher and author Kent Heckenlively summed up the momentum shift by saying:
“It’s hard to tell just a little bit of the truth. Once you start telling the truth, you’ve got to tell it all.”
Whether the claims ultimately withstand scientific and governmental scrutiny remains an open question. But the trajectory is clear: what was once confined to classified briefings and closed-door discussions is now being aired in public forums, congressional hearings, and high-profile interviews.
And with additional files still expected to be released, the central question continues to grow louder: not just whether any of it is real—but how much has been known, and for how long, before the public was ever told.
