>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
Patrice Johnson, Chair of Pure Integrity Michigan Elections (PIME), expressed serious concerns about the bill’s implications. “Under the auspices of equity, these bills create favored ‘protected classes,’” she said. “They give the state judicial and executive branches of government authoritarian control over local jurisdictions and minimize the role of duly elected legislators. They use taxpayer dollars to fund the government takeover.”
A particularly contentious aspect of SB 401 is the establishment of the Michigan Voting Rights Assistance Fund. This fund would funnel taxpayer money to support lawsuits and legal actions against local governments. Critics argue that this fund could become a tool for weaponizing the courts against municipalities that don’t align with the state’s political agenda.
Johnson didn’t mince words when discussing the potential impact of the fund. “This bill creates a bottomless pit of funding for lawfare against local governments and citizens. The funds come from taxpayer dollars and ‘charitable contributions or from any other source,’” she explained. “This is tantamount to welcoming dark money and institutionalizing banana republic corruption. Plus, the funds remain separate in perpetuity.”
The Michigan Voting Rights Assistance Fund, as outlined in the bill, would not return unused funds to the state’s general fund, raising concerns about transparency and accountability.
Republican lawmakers are vocally opposing these bills, with former Secretary of State and current Senator Ruth Johnson, R-Holly, leading the charge. She argued that Senate Bill 404, in particular, would compromise voter privacy and create unnecessary hurdles for local election officials.
“These bills would cost taxpayers millions of dollars and create new obstacles for our clerks and local units of government that are simply unnecessary,” Sen. Johnson said. She warned that the bills go beyond current federal and state voting rights protections, adding unnecessary layers of bureaucracy.
Senator Johnson was especially critical of SB 404’s potential to allow electioneering inside polling places. She noted that under the bill’s language, candidates could campaign in polling locations by offering snacks to voters waiting in line—a practice currently outlawed as electioneering.
“Under this bill, I could enter a polling location — even if I was a candidate on the ballot — and say ‘Hi, I’m Ruth Johnson, please accept this snack while you’re waiting in line to vote,’” Johnson remarked. Despite her objections, Johnson’s proposed amendments to restrict this kind of activity were defeated in the Senate.
Senator Jim Runestad, R-White Lake, voiced concerns over SB 402 and SB 403, which he believes would place significant financial and logistical burdens on local governments. SB 403, for example, mandates language assistance for voters at polling places, which Runestad criticized as both costly and difficult to implement.
“This bill would not only place a substantial financial burden on local governments, but it will also be especially burdensome as part of the election day process at the precincts,” Runestad explained. He advocated for alternative legislation that would focus on providing English language programs for non-English-speaking voters, rather than relying on local governments to shoulder the costs of language assistance at the polls.
One of the underlying concerns is the potential for these bills to take effect earlier than anticipated. While they are currently set to go into effect in January 2026, Johnson warned that the secretary of state may use existing rules to push through changes sooner.
“The executive branch is trying to change the rules and adopt SB 603 early under the Administrative Procedures Act. It’s logical to assume they’ll try to do the same with this entire package,” Johnson warned.
The bills now move to the Michigan House for further debate. As lawmakers prepare for more discussions, concerns remain about the potential costs, the legal challenges that could arise, and the balance between ensuring equal access to voting and protecting election integrity.
If you are a Michigan resident and concerned about these bills, contact your state representative today and urge them to vote NO on House Journal 66 and Senate Bills 401, 402, 403, and 404.
