Before the disastrous Covid-19 epidemic, a Chinese scientist in Wuhan, China, who was in charge of controversial viral research, had a covert meeting with the US government. This conference was held with the intention of obtaining support for a project that would ultimately significantly increase the potency of coronaviruses.
Revealed as ‘Batwoman’ for her noteworthy contributions to animal virus sequencing and sampling, Shi Zhengli has been a key player in dissecting the collaborative efforts between China and the United States in addressing the aftermath of the Covid pandemic. A possible Western-Chinese conspiracy to hide the true origins of the new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has been brought to light by the June 2017 meeting between Shi Zhengli and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the United States. Most people agree that a careless lab experiment at the Wuhan Institute of Virology is the source of this virus.
Don’t miss this! Carry faith with you everywhere with the Exclusive National Prayer Coin!
The Daily Mail on Sunday examined recently acquired data that reveals the degree to which the US often financed and encouraged the contentious studies carried out at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
In an attempt to increase their prospects of financing, US researchers have deceived regulators about the hazards associated with their study on “spike proteins,” which allow bat viruses to enter human cells.
A directive issued by Chinese intelligence on January 3, 2020, two days after the world first learned about Covid, requires its scientists to either share their samples with the government or destroy them “on the spot,” according to documents obtained by US Right To Know, a non-profit organization dedicated to public health research.
It is now thought that a lab break in Wuhan is the most likely source of the Covid virus, rather than the city’s wildlife market, according to leaked information from Western intelligence services. These documents include correspondence from representatives of EcoHealth Alliance, a group that was funded by the US government before Professor Zhengli became involved in bat virus research.
“Zhengli and I will do a double act, and we’ll cover the work we’re doing … as well as the broadscale surveillance of bats for novel viruses,” says EcoHealth’s $460,000-a-year chief, Peter Daszak.
Hundreds of kilometers from Wuhan, in southern China, are the bat caverns where Professor Zhengli, often referred to as “Batwoman,” made her expedition. Her crew successfully gathered over 10,000 animal samples while on virus-hunting missions.
The Wuhan Institute of Virology’s Covid-19 sequencing and the one identified in the caves closely match. Associate professor Peng Zhou was also present during the meeting.
ALERT! Major Water Restrictions In Effect!
After the meeting, Daszak wrote to thank the hosts, stating that it was “nice to have a chance to introduce our collaborators to you personally.”
Additionally, in December 2018, a year before the Covid-19 virus surfaced, EcoHealth pushed the Pentagon for funds for Zhengli to manufacture high-risk coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute by synthesizing spike proteins with furin cleavage sites that were intended to connect to human receptors more readily.
Concerned about gain-of-function studies, Dr. Ralph Baric, an expert on coronaviruses, admitted in an email that US researchers would “freak out” if they found out that novel coronavirus engineering and testing was being done in low-security Chinese laboratories. However, he covered it up to make the US government more “comfortable” with the plan, which the researchers say is meant to help prevent pandemics.
Although the US government rejected the proposal, some claim the ideas it included served as a “blueprint” for the creation of Covid. Professor Zhengli has criticized the notion of a lab leak as erroneous, citing allegations from US intelligence that other colleagues at the institute were contaminated prior to the outbreak being apparent.
When the charges were pressed, she stated: “How on earth can I offer up evidence for something where there is no evidence? I don’t know how the world has come to this, constantly pouring filth on an innocent scientist.”
The idea was rejected by the US government, but its detractors contend that its goals act as a “blueprint” for the development of Covid. Both the idea of a lab breach and US intelligence claims that many of her colleagues at the institute were sick before the outbreak appeared have been rejected by Professor Zhengli.
In response to a question about the disclosing papers, she said: “How on earth can I offer up evidence for something where there is no evidence? I don’t know how the world has come to this, constantly pouring filth on an innocent scientist.”
It was revealed during a critical hearing in March 2023 by the House’s Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic that the Wuhan Institute of Virology lacked adequate security measures.
“We have learned that the Wuhan Institute has poor biosafety and was conducting this research at only biosafety level two, described as ‘the Wild West’ by Dr. Jeremy Farrar, a virologist from the UK, now chief scientist for the WHO,” As highlighted by Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-OH), the Subcommittee Chair.
However, court records revealed that prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, prominent public supporters of laboratory studies involving the “generating a potentially dangerous virus in a laboratory,” included former NIAID Director Dr. Fauci and former NIH Chief Dr. Francis Collins.
According to the exhibit, this type of study involves “generating a potentially dangerous virus in a laboratory.” It is frequently referred to as “gain-of-function” research. “[G]ain of function is a very potentially misleading terminology, and that was one of the reasons that outside groups, not the NIH… did away with the terminology ‘gain of function’ several years ago because it can often be very confusing and misleading,” stated Dr. Fauci in her testimony. However, Dr. Fauci affirms that “the NIH” did not “d[o] away” with that terminology, and the attorneys went on, citing Dr. Fauci’s own internal email in which he used the term “SARS Gain of Function” to characterize the bat coronavirus research that Dr. Shi Zhengli and colleagues at the Wuhan Institute of Virology conducted. This research was partially funded by Dr. Fauci’s NIAID through the subgrants from the EcoHealth Alliance.
The legal document emphasizes Fauci’s contribution to the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s high-risk gain-of-function research funding.
“On June 1, 2014, Dr. Fauci’s NIAID funded a grant to the EcoHealth Alliance for the five-year period June 1, 2014, to May 31, 2019. Fauci Ex. 2, at 2. The title of the project was ‘Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence.’ The project’s Abstract stated: “This project will examine the risk of future coronavirus (CoV) emergence from wildlife using indepth field investigations across the human-wildlife interface in China, molecular characterization of novel CoVs and host receptor binding domain genes, mathematical models of transmission and evolution, and in vitro and in vivo laboratory studies of host range.”
One of the “three specific aims” of the project, according to the abstract, is to “[t]est predictions of CoV inter-species transmission” through two types of research to increase the transmissibility of bat coronaviruses to humans: “virus infection experiments” using “humanized mice,” which entails repeatedly infecting humanized mice with bat coronaviruses to induce mutations that make them more infectious to human cells (a process known as “serial passage”). The Abstract specifically said the following: “Virus infection experiments across a range of cell cultures from different species and humanized mice, as well as reverse genetics, pseudovirus and receptor binding assays, and predictive models of host range (i.e., emergence potential) will be tested experimentally.”
The attorneys pointed out that Dr. Fauci attempted to contend that because the term “reverse genetics” is so ambiguous, it might not apply to gain-of-function studies. “I’m not really clear to what they’re alluding. The meaning of reverse genetics is multifaceted. However, “reverse genetics” refers to “[m]anipulation of a virus, recombination, things like that,” as Dr. Fauci acknowledges. Drs. Ralph Baric and Shi Zhengli reported in a 2015 publication that they had employed “reverse genetics” to “generate and characterize a chimeric virus” that was more virulent and contagious in humans. The study was conducted in accordance with this award. The attorneys further said that the publication addressed “SARS Gain of Function” according to Dr. Fauci’s own internal communication.
The Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic has announced that Dr. Anthony Fauci would make his first appearance before the 118th Congress on January 8, 2024 and January 9, 2024, for a two-day transcribed interview.
