David Scanlan, the secretary of state for New Hampshire, could stop Donald Trump from being put on the ballot for the upcoming state primary. The 14th Amendment has been interpreted incorrectly in this decision’s foundation.
Numerous messages have pushed Scanlan, a well-known Republican, to use the U.S. Trump should not be allowed to run for president in New Hampshire’s much anticipated primary, which is just months away.
Secret government manifestation pill 💊?
“Not being a lawyer and not wanting to make a decision in a vacuum, I will be soliciting some legal opinions on what is appropriate or not before I make any decision,” On Friday, Scanlan spoke with The Boston Globe.
The key point centers on the liberal claim that Trump “incited insurrection” on January 6, 2021. They contend that this disqualifies him from running for office once more in accordance with Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
After the Civil War, in 1868, a law was amended to exclude former Confederate officials and politicians from holding federal offices.
Regarding Trump’s purported promotion of uprisings, Scanlan tried to tread carefully by expressing uncertainty.
“I view the violence as being a really unfortunate event in our history,” he said, according to the Globe. “I don’t know that I’m really qualified to say whether that was an ‘insurrection’ or not. I think that is for the courts to decide.”
Trump, the former president, has not only not been convicted of insurrection, but he hasn’t even been charged with it. This is despite facing four indictments from the Democratic lawfare machine, none of which have been for “insurrection.”
None of the suspects indicted in connection with the disturbance on January 6 have faced “sedition” charges.
WATCH: Church Leaders PRAYED you’d never see this…
In a novel reading of Section 3, renowned legal authorities J. According to Michael Luttig and Laurence Tribe, Trump can still be stripped of the president under the 14th Amendment.
“The disqualification clause operates independently of any … criminal proceedings,” the pair said.
“The clause was designed to operate directly and immediately upon those who betray their oaths to the Constitution, whether by taking up arms to overturn our government or by waging war on our government by attempting to overturn a presidential election through a bloodless coup.”
Two Federalist Society members, William Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen, recently argued in the Pennsylvania Law Review that election authorities have a duty to prevent Trump from being on the ballot, according to an ABC News story.
“No official should shrink from these duties. It would be wrong — indeed, arguably itself a breach of one’s constitutional oath of office — to abandon one’s responsibilities of faithful interpretation, application, and enforcement of Section Three,” the two wrote.
Legal experts do not all agree on the same thing.
According to Kevin Wagner, a political science professor, “there is considerable debate over what it means to be involved in insurrection or revolt and how it is understood. We face a dilemma because it hasn’t been clearly defined previously.
The subjective nature of insurrection definition makes it difficult.
Regarding what happened on January 6, there is a lot of debate. Many people consider it to be a real uprising, but others say that it was merely a protest that may have developed into criminal conduct. On the other hand, there is disagreement on whether it qualifies as an insurrection or a revolt.
“And the provision of the 14th Amendment really turns on how … we assess what happened,” Wagner said.
Wagner is accurate.
Liberals frequently utilize the word “insurrection” in their arguments. The idea that the demonstrators in the Capitol wanted to overthrow the government is challenging to accept, nevertheless. There were no coordinated actions, no firearms, and no real attempts to obstruct the certification of the 2020 election within the Capitol.
As the situation grew out of control, Trump specifically commanded his fans to protest “peacefully and patriotically.”
The left and establishment Republicans, some of whom are no better than the left, are both gripped by the terror of a second Trump presidency. Trump’s threat to their grasp on power, not a manufactured “insurrection,” is the reason they are trying to stop him.
