>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
Right behind it:
Rhode Island at 16.32%.
New Jersey at 15.74%.
Maine at 14.97%.
These are not energy-heavy red states dependent on coal. These are states that have spent years shuttering traditional power plants, restricting pipeline expansion, and forcing utilities to prioritize wind and solar generation.
The District of Columbia posted the most dramatic spike in the nation: 26.29%.
Yes, Washington, D.C. — home to the bureaucrats who crafted the rules reshaping the grid — saw costs jump more than a quarter in just one year.
Ohio recorded a 14.45% increase.
Maryland followed at 12.97%.
California came in at 12.18%.
New York rose 10.7%.
Forty-four states plus D.C. saw year-over-year electricity price hikes, based on Energy Information Administration data from December.
That’s not isolated. That’s systemic.
Regulators Pushed, Consumers Paid
Energy analyst Phil Flynn of Price Futures Group explained the dynamic clearly. He told Fox Business that regulators pushed utilities away from reliable baseload generation and created obstacles to maintaining and expanding traditional energy infrastructure.
In several states, new buildings are now required to rely on electricity rather than natural gas. That increases demand — even as supply from dependable sources shrinks.
The result is simple economics. Less reliable supply. More mandated demand. Higher prices.
The AI Factor No One Is Talking About
There’s another force quietly straining the system.
Artificial intelligence data centers are consuming extraordinary amounts of electricity. A single AI request uses roughly ten times the power of a standard Google search. Tech giants poured hundreds of billions into expanding these facilities last year alone.
Meanwhile, PJM — the nation’s largest regional grid operator serving 65 million people across 13 states including Pennsylvania and New Jersey — is projecting a six-gigawatt shortfall in reliability requirements by 2027.
Capacity market prices in PJM have skyrocketed from $28.92 per megawatt to $329.17 per megawatt in just two years.
That explosion does not disappear into thin air. It shows up in household bills.
Trump’s Countermove
During his presidency, Trump repeatedly argued that energy independence was inseparable from economic stability. He has since doubled down.
On his first day back in office, he declared a National Energy Emergency.
His administration reports that 17 gigawatts of coal-fired generation were preserved from shutdown. During Winter Storm Fern, coal and nuclear together provided 86% of grid power, while solar contributed just 2%.
The Department of Energy has highlighted that electricity prices rose roughly 30% during Biden’s term, increasing at a pace thirteen times faster than in the seven years prior.
Trump’s current strategy includes $2.7 billion for domestic nuclear fuel enrichment and $625 million aimed at strengthening the coal sector. He also signed an executive order instructing the Pentagon to secure long-term power purchase agreements with coal plants, citing grid reliability concerns.
In addition, a $15 billion agreement with Mid-Atlantic governors is targeting new baseload power plants in regions experiencing the sharpest price increases.
A Stark Contrast
Not every state followed the same path.
Nevada saw electricity prices decline 7.68%.
Connecticut dropped 7.57%.
West Virginia — long associated with coal production — experienced just a modest 1.42% increase.
The divide is becoming increasingly visible. States that aggressively reduced conventional generation capacity are experiencing some of the sharpest cost spikes.
The question now facing voters is not abstract.
Can the grid be stabilized before soaring demand from AI expansion and years of regulatory pressure push prices even higher?
For millions of families opening their monthly utility statements, the debate over energy policy is no longer theoretical.
It’s personal.
