>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
Boebert explained that while none of the language explicitly spells out cannibalism, certain repeated references stood out to her in troubling ways.
There’s a lot of talk of beef jerky. There’s a restaurant called The Cannibal, where the owner is listed in some of these documents. Now, that isn’t a restaurant that is claiming to serve human meat by any means, but some of this just seems like there are a lot of conspiracies that make you wonder.
The Colorado lawmaker was careful to note that names and references alone do not constitute proof. However, she emphasized that the broader context—especially when paired with other content in the emails—made the material difficult to dismiss outright.
According to Boebert, the documents also contain repeated discussions that appear to revolve around torture, which she described as a recurring theme within the correspondence.
Boebert: I saw more emails about torture. These coded conversations still have a very clear topic — that torture was big. It was a big driver for them. And these were sick people doing very, very sick things.
Boebert went on to say that one of the most disturbing aspects of the files is the apparent involvement of women who worked directly within Epstein’s operation. She alleged that emails show women actively participating in the recruitment and trafficking of minors.
As you mentioned, there are many women who are involved in this. You have folks who were working directly for Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. And a lot of these women are the ones sending emails saying, “Here’s one, 10 years old, 11 years old, 9 years old.”
It’s just very disturbing to see the women who are involved in this.
Boebert’s remarks were not the only ones drawing attention. Florida Republican Rep. Anna Paulina Luna echoed similar concerns during a separate appearance on The Benny Show, where she discussed her own review of Epstein-related emails that have circulated publicly.
Luna said that after examining the messages herself, she was left with troubling questions about their true meaning and intent.
“I looked directly at the emails that have been widely circulated about the ‘Age 11,’ and what I called the ‘Permission to Kill’ email,” Luna told Johnson.
“These were emails sent by women to Epstein — many of whom were victims who were allegedly groomed to later be traffickers themselves.”
Luna also referenced unfamiliar terminology that appeared repeatedly in the correspondence, suggesting it may have been used as coded language.
Luna said she saw the phrase “‘Jerky’ — whatever that is,” and alleged, “It’s a code word, and it’s weird.”
WATCH:
Together, the comments from Boebert and Luna have reignited demands for full transparency surrounding the Epstein case—one that many Americans believe has never been fully exposed. While neither lawmaker claimed to have definitive proof of the most extreme interpretations, both stressed that the public has not been told the whole story.
As calls grow louder for the complete release of all Epstein-related materials, these revelations are likely to intensify pressure on federal agencies and political elites who may be implicated—or who may have worked to keep key details buried for years.
Whether these documents ultimately confirm or dispel the darkest suspicions, one thing is clear: the Epstein scandal is far from over, and many Americans are demanding answers that Washington has long avoided.
