>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
The complaint tries to recast a controversial moment in 2020 into a heroic one. The agents say that on June 4 of that year, while responding to BLM-related unrest in Washington, D.C., they encountered a tense crowd mixed with “hostile” individuals and children. With the nation already at a boiling point following the death of George Floyd, tensions were high and the streets volatile.
That’s when the kneeling happened. The lawsuit claims the agents weren’t virtue-signaling but applying tactical wisdom to prevent bloodshed. The filing describes their decision in dramatic terms:
“Plaintiffs were performing their duties as FBI Special Agents, employing reasonable de-escalation to prevent a potentially deadly confrontation with American citizens: a Washington Massacre that could have rivaled the Boston Massacre in 1770.”
The agents argue they were boxed into a dangerous scenario. They lacked proper riot-control tools and were outnumbered. The choice, they claim, was either kneeling or opening fire — nothing in between. The complaint frames their controversial act as a life-saving maneuver:
“Plaintiffs demonstrated tactical intelligence in choosing between deadly force, the only force available to them as a practical matter, given their lack of adequate crowd control equipment, and a less-than-lethal response that would save lives and keep order.”
And according to the lawsuit, it worked.
“As a result of their tactical decision to kneel, the mass of people moved on without escalating to violence. Plaintiffs did not need to discharge their firearms that day. Plaintiffs saved American lives.”
Despite that portrayal, the agents were fired in September. Patel accused them of “unprofessional conduct and a lack of impartiality in carrying out duties, leading to the political weaponization of government.” In short, Patel suggested their kneeling did exactly what the lawsuit denies — turned federal agents into political actors.
Now the former agents want far more than sympathy. Their lawsuit demands reinstatement, back pay, damages, a declaration that their termination violated the Constitution, and the scrubbing of all disciplinary records tied to the incident. They are essentially asking a federal court to declare their BLM kneeling not only appropriate but heroic.
The bureau, for its part, is staying silent. Both the Department of Justice and the FBI declined to comment, leaving the public — and the political class — to fight over what this case says about policing, protest, and politics inside America’s top law-enforcement agency.
What’s clear is this: the lawsuit sets up a high-stakes showdown over whether kneeling for BLM in the middle of a riot is a noble act of de-escalation or a symbol of political bias incompatible with FBI duty. And Kash Patel is right at the center of the storm.
