>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
He even pushed the bizarre claim that the hand around Giuffre’s waist might not have been his.
But a bombshell document release from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate has now obliterated that talking point entirely.
Democrats on the House Oversight Committee dropped tens of thousands of pages of records this week. Buried in that trove was a 2011 email that Epstein casually sent to a reporter — and it absolutely guts Andrew’s story.
“Yes she was on my plane, and yes she had her picture taken with Andrew, as many of my employees have,” Epstein admitted in the email.
Not only did Epstein confirm the photo’s authenticity — he confirmed that Giuffre was on the convicted predator’s private jet with Andrew.
This message was written just months after the Daily Mail first published the now-infamous image showing Andrew with his arm wrapped around Giuffre, while Ghislaine Maxwell stands smiling nearby.
Giuffre has maintained for years that Epstein and Maxwell forced her into encounters with Andrew several times in 2001 — one in London, one in New York, and one on Epstein’s Caribbean island.
Andrew dismissed every allegation.
Epstein’s email now proves he wasn’t telling the truth.
The email revelations didn’t stop there.
Another message from March 2011 — right as Giuffre’s claims were preparing to explode into the press — shows someone using the account alias “The Duke,” widely believed to be Andrew, frantically pleading with Maxwell.
“What’s all this? I don’t know anything about this! You must SAY so please. This has NOTHING to do with me. I can’t take any more of this,” the message read.
That same day, Andrew reached out directly to Epstein, evidently trying to coordinate damage control.
“Please make sure that every statement or legal letter states clearly that I am NOT involved and that I knew and know NOTHING about any of these allegations,” Andrew wrote.
Epstein responded two days later with a drafted message Andrew could give to his press team. It dismissed the claims as “fantasy,” bizarrely tossed in a reference to Al Gore, and most notably labeled Giuffre “the girl who accused Prince Andrew” — while urging reporters to go after her and calling her “a fraud.”
If Andrew truly didn’t know Giuffre, why was Epstein drafting talking points for him?
Andrew believed the 2019 BBC interview would be his chance to clear the air. Instead, it became one of the most catastrophic PR disasters in modern royal history.
He argued he couldn’t have been sweating at a nightclub because of a medical condition.
He claimed he remembered being at Pizza Express with his daughter.
He said his friendship with Epstein had offered “opportunities” that were “actually very useful.”
The stunning lack of remorse triggered a nationwide backlash.
Within days, the palace cut him out of public life.
Sponsors fled.
His royal titles evaporated.
Still — he maintained the photo wasn’t real.
Now, that narrative is officially dead.
Giuffre tragically died earlier this year, but her memoir — Nobody’s Girl — arrived months later and contained new allegations about Andrew.
She wrote that Andrew recognized her age immediately, telling her, “My daughters are just a little younger than you.”
She also revealed that Andrew’s legal team attempted to hire online trolls to harass her during her civil case.
“After casting doubt on my credibility for so long – Prince Andrew’s team had even gone so far as to try to hire internet trolls to hassle me – the Duke of York owed me a meaningful apology as well,” she wrote.
Andrew eventually settled the lawsuit in 2022 for a sum widely reported to exceed $12 million.
With pressure mounting, King Charles ultimately revoked Andrew’s titles and ordered him out of the Royal Lodge.
“His Majesty has today initiated a formal process to remove the Style, Titles and Honours of Prince Andrew,” Buckingham Palace declared.
The statement concluded: “Prince Andrew will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor.”
The man once known as the Duke of York is now simply a disgraced private citizen.
Democrats on the House Oversight Committee are now demanding Andrew testify.
Representative Suhas Subramanyam said if Andrew “wants to do right by the victims, he will come forward.”
But judging by Andrew’s 14-year pattern of denial, evasion, and deception, few expect him to ever sit under oath.
The newly uncovered emails make one thing clear:
Prince Andrew wasn’t confused.
He wasn’t misquoted.
He wasn’t mistaken.
He lied — for years — and the evidence finally caught up with him.
