>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
Even more alarming, Open Society pumped $18 million into the Movement for Black Lives, which co-wrote a radical manual that glorified Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel. The guide allegedly instructs activists on how to use fake IDs, blockade streets, and cripple businesses.
The investigation also discovered that OSF sent over $2.3 million to Al-Haq, a West Bank NGO accused for decades of working with the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP)—a U.S.- and EU-designated terrorist group.
In September 2025, the U.S. State Department officially sanctioned Al-Haq, stating the organization was “directly engaged in the ICC’s illegitimate targeting of Israel.”
This means Soros’s foundation financially supported an entity now blacklisted by Washington—a staggering revelation.
The CRC report alleges that Soros’s philanthropy “blurs into complicity—fueling groups that celebrate violent uprisings, train militants, and endorse terrorist movements.”
The report raises urgent questions about whether OSF and its grantees should keep their tax-exempt status while financing groups tied to criminal or terrorist activities.
U.S. law is clear: charities lose their tax-exempt status if they fund or facilitate illegal activity. The IRS even specifies that nonprofits promoting unlawful property seizures or blockades do not qualify as legitimate charities.
CRC argues OSF’s actions could trigger federal racketeering laws, IRS penalties, or even criminal investigations.
President Trump recently signaled support for going after Soros legally.
“We’re going to look into Soros because I think it’s a RICO case against him and other people,” Trump said in a Fox News interview.
Republican lawmakers are also pushing for hearings on OSF’s tax-exempt status and its foreign funding ties. Some are openly calling for Congress to revoke the foundation’s nonprofit protections altogether.
If federal authorities conclude that OSF knowingly aided groups tied to terrorism or domestic crime, the penalties could be severe—including loss of tax status, civil lawsuits, or even criminal charges under RICO laws.
“The evidence is stark,” the report warns. “Open Society has financed groups that glorify violence, destabilize societies, and partner with organizations that are openly hostile to the United States and its allies.”
For now, OSF remains one of the largest private philanthropies in the world, controlling an estimated $25 billion in assets. Whether its massive network will face real legal consequences now depends on whether Congress and the Justice Department decide to act.
