>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
And it gets worse.
Rice noted that Comey expressed direct concern about General Flynn, President Trump’s incoming National Security Advisor, and his communication with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.
“Comey said he does have some concerns that incoming NSA Flynn is speaking frequently with Russian Ambassador Kislyak,” the email reads. “Comey said that could be an issue as it relates to sharing sensitive information.”
Then came a revealing exchange that makes the motive crystal clear.
“President Obama asked if Comey was saying the NSC should not pass sensitive information related to Russia to Flynn,” Rice wrote. “Comey replied ‘potentially.’”
It’s important to pause and reflect here. The highest levels of the Obama administration were openly discussing limiting access to intelligence for an incoming official — not due to evidence of wrongdoing, but because of “concerns” over conversations that would be standard for a national security advisor preparing to take office.
Even Comey admitted there was no hard proof of any misconduct.
“[Comey] added that he has no indication thus far that Flynn has passed classified information to Kislyak, but he noted that ‘the level of communication is unusual.’”
What’s truly “unusual” is the weaponization of intelligence agencies against a political opponent before he even stepped into the Oval Office.
This newly unveiled piece of the puzzle was obtained by The Federalist, and it offers critical confirmation of what many conservatives have said all along — that Flynn was targeted before Trump’s inauguration, not for any criminal behavior, but because he was viewed as a threat to the political status quo.
Let’s not forget the outcome.
Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report eventually acknowledged that the FBI had no legitimate reason to launch the Russia-Trump collusion probe in the first place. In Flynn’s case, it found “no derogatory information” other than the guilty plea he was cornered into under immense legal pressure — a plea he later withdrew.
Even the Department of Justice came to the same conclusion in a report that described how Flynn was “ambushed” by FBI agents — a move later recognized as the backbone of a politicized and unjust prosecution. That very same DOJ is now working to eliminate any remaining charges against him.
Handwritten notes from top FBI officials revealed an even more sinister objective: to “prosecute him or get him fired.”
While Flynn has remained outside formal government positions since then, President Trump appointed him in March to a military advisory board overseeing standards and curriculum at America’s service academies.
It’s a fitting turn of events for a man whose reputation was dragged through the mud for simply doing his job — a job that, as it turns out, made him the enemy of an outgoing administration bent on holding on to power.
Flynn’s story, once buried beneath the rubble of false accusations and media spin, is now rising as a symbol of resistance against deep state overreach. The latest revelations should concern every American who values truth, accountability, and a government that serves its people — not its political class.
