>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
The Israeli operation came just as nuclear negotiations between Iran and the Trump administration hit a dead end. Tehran had flatly rejected the most recent U.S. proposal, calling it a “non-starter.”
Trump, attempting to revive diplomacy, had issued an ultimatum weeks earlier. “Two months ago I gave Iran a 60-day ultimatum to ‘make a deal.’ They should have done it! Today is day 61,” he wrote on Truth Social.
The sixth round of nuclear talks was scheduled for Sunday in Oman. That meeting is now almost certainly dead in the water.
Hours after Israel’s strikes, Marco Rubio delivered a jarring press release that appeared to distance the United States from its closest Middle Eastern ally.
“Tonight, Israel took unilateral action against Iran. We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region,” Rubio declared.
That word—unilateral—set off alarm bells in Washington. For decades, U.S.-Israeli operations have often been closely coordinated, even if Washington stayed out of the limelight. Rubio’s phrasing suggested otherwise.
He added, “Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense,” implying that the U.S. was notified after the decision was made—not involved in the planning.
Conspicuously missing from Rubio’s statement was any promise to defend Israel should Iran retaliate—a commitment that has long been standard language in similar crises. As one foreign policy analyst noted, “His statement did not mention whether Washington would support Israel if it faces retaliatory strikes, a standard line in the past.”
Sources inside the White House confirmed that Israel’s timing came as a surprise. The Trump administration had been preparing for renewed talks, hoping to leverage diplomacy while keeping military options in the background.
President Trump told reporters, “I think it’s been excellent. We gave them a chance and they didn’t take it.”
But he didn’t stop there. He followed up on Truth Social with a chilling warning: “There has already been great death and destruction, but there is still time to make this slaughter, with the next already planned attacks being even more brutal, come to an end.”
Behind the scenes, the growing rift between Trump and Netanyahu is becoming harder to ignore. While Trump seeks a diplomatic win with Iran, Netanyahu seems intent on ending Iran’s nuclear ambitions by force—regardless of timing or consequence.
Within hours, Iran launched a massive retaliatory strike, sending roughly 100 drones toward Israeli territory. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei promised “severe punishment” while President Masoud Pezeshkian pledged a “tough, rational and powerful response.”
With senior military leaders dead and key nuclear infrastructure damaged, any hope for a peaceful resolution appears lost.
Perhaps the most revealing part of Rubio’s statement came in his stern message to Tehran:
“Let me be clear: Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel.”
The warning exposes growing fears inside the Trump administration that American service members and diplomats could soon find themselves under fire. U.S. troops are stationed across the region—in Iraq, Syria, Jordan, and the Gulf—within easy reach of Iranian proxies or missile strikes.
Insiders say the State Department has already begun quietly relocating personnel from Baghdad and other sensitive posts.
Rubio’s blunt assertion that the U.S. was not involved in Israel’s attack is unprecedented. For a country that’s spent decades giving Israel full-throated backing, the statement is a dramatic departure.
Whether this marks a pivot toward Trump’s “America First” doctrine or is simply an attempt to maintain plausible deniability remains to be seen.
But one thing is clear—this latest Middle East conflict has thrust the United States into an incredibly dangerous position, and the fallout is only beginning.
