>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
WATCH:
Calacanis stated, âWe look at the five cases six months from nowâŠLetâs assume they all go to trial; heâs guilty of three so far.â To which Kelly firmly responded, âWhat do you mean heâs guilty?â
Calacanis fumbled to clarify, replying, âHeâs been convicted of three so farâŠâ before Kelly cut him off again, pointing out, âNo he hasnât.â The exchange continued with Calacanis referencing the E. Jean Carroll case, to which Kelly emphasized that it was a civil case, not a criminal conviction, a distinction that drew more laughs and applause from the audience.
Throughout the conversation, Calacanis attempted to challenge Kelly, but she remained unfazed. At one point, he pushed her to admit that if Trump were found guilty in the two remaining cases, it would prove that there was no conspiracy against him. Kelly didnât hesitate, delivering a rapid-fire response that left the host visibly stunned.
â100%! E. Jean Carroll changed the law so that they could bring a civil lawsuit against him. New York went 87% for Joe Biden, and that fix was in place from the start,â Kelly explained. She went on to dismantle the legitimacy of each case, from Letitia Jamesâ fraud trial to Alvin Braggâs pursuit of Trump. Kelly even brought up Fani Willis in Georgia, dismissing the case as politically motivated.
Kelly didnât stop there, digging into the double standards of the legal system, particularly in New York. She pointed out, âNobody was complaining except Tish James, who ran for office, saying, âI will get him.â Then you have Alvin Bragg, a George Soros-funded prosecutor who doesnât like to prosecute any crime in New York City except if your name is Donald Trump!â
Her legal takedown continued, addressing the case in Florida over classified documents. Kelly confidently predicted that Trump would prevail, saying, âThey havenât even gotten to presidential immunity there so that one is going nowhere. Theyâre going to appeal (Smithâs appointment) up to the 11th Circuit of Appeals, and itâs conservative, and thank God, so is the current Supreme Court. Theyâre not going to tolerate that nonsense.â
The crowd responded enthusiastically throughout the conversation, with applause breaking out multiple times as Kelly delivered her points with precision and passion. By the end of the exchange, it was clear that Megyn Kelly had not only defended Trump but had also demonstrated a deep understanding of the legal challenges he faces, much to the delight of the audience.
In an era where the media often portrays Trumpâs legal troubles as an insurmountable obstacle, Kellyâs perspective serves as a reminder that many of these cases are not as clear-cut as they may seem. Her sharp analysis and unwavering defense of Trump have solidified her position as one of his most effective advocates.
Kellyâs transformation from a critic to an ally of Trump is remarkable. In the face of what many consider to be politically motivated legal attacks, she remains unyielding in her support, offering not just opinions but informed legal arguments that resonate with those who believe in Trumpâs innocence.
The events of the All-In Summit showed a side of Kelly that many may not have anticipated years ago. Still, her ability to captivate an audience while defending Trump was nothing short of impressive, earning her a standing ovation and reaffirming her role as a key voice in the conversation surrounding the former president’s future.
Here is the full video:
