In response to the latest decision by the Colorado Supreme Court, Trump’s campaign is vehement. The statement exposes the fact that the court’s appointments are all Democrats and harshly criticizes the court’s ruling.
The Colorado Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that Donald Trump would not be allowed to run for president in the state in 2024, setting a precedent-setting decision. This historic ruling, which is based on the U.S. Constitution’s insurrection clause, establishes an amazing precedent as the first time a state supreme court has explicitly assessed and determined Trump’s eligibility for public office.
Don’t miss this! Carry faith with you everywhere with the Exclusive National Prayer Coin!
By removing Trump’s name from the ballot, the court, according to Trump’s lawyers, was aiding a “Soros-funded, left-wing group’s scheme” sponsored by George Soros to rig the election in favor of Joe Biden. They claim that the action takes away Colorado voters’ ability to select the candidate of their choice.
“Democrat Party leaders are in a state of paranoia over the growing, dominant lead President Trump has amassed in the polls. They have lost faith in the failed Biden presidency and are now doing everything they can to stop the American voters from throwing them out of office next November,” Steven Cheung, a spokesperson for Trump, wrote.
“The Colorado Supreme Court issued a completely flawed decision tonight and we will swiftly file an appeal to the United States Supreme Court and a concurrent request for a stay of this deeply undemocratic decision.”
A petition submitted by a number of Colorado electors sparked the issue and resulted in a Denver District Court trial. The Fourteenth Amendment’s Section Three defines insurrection, and the court found “clear and convincing” evidence that Trump participated in it.
Section Three of the Colorado Supreme Court prohibits Trump from seeking the presidency. The Secretary of State is not allowed to put him on the primary ballot according to the Election Code.
The date of a historic decision is January 4, 2024, therefore put that day on your calendar. Explore the fascinating discussion on whether presidential eligibility is affected by the application of Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Learn about the “Disqualification Clause”—a vital provision that establishes a person’s eligibility for important government positions, like the presidency. Find out how their prior participation in a revolt or insurrection against the US may affect their eligibility.
ALERT! Major Water Restrictions In Effect!
This is the pertinent passage from the Fourteenth Amendment’s Section 3:
“No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.”
The Trump campaign is bringing the subject before the US Supreme Court, indicating a national investigation into the problem. This may set a precedent for similar disputes involving the eligibility of presidential candidates in the future.
REACTIONS:
