>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
“We know for a fact now that General Mark Milley…directed, ordered, and authorized the use of both heat and sound-directed energy weapons to be used against the protesters,” Baker said during the interview. “We have the photography now to prove it, to back it up.”
Baker explained that the function of these weapons depends on their settings. The super audible frequencies are typically meant to disperse crowds, while the subaudible frequencies—referred to as “agitation weapons”—are reportedly designed to create psychological distress, which could potentially provoke violence.
Gonzales was quick to connect these allegations to her own theories about government entrapment.
“I believe January 6 was total entrapment by the United States government in order to weaponize their own agencies against their people,” Gonzales said. “I’m just going to go ahead and double down on that at this point, Steve.”
While Baker did not delve deeply into connections between the events of 2020 and January 6, he hinted at broader implications, suggesting that the use of such tactics might not be isolated incidents.
The protests in Washington, D.C., were part of a national wave of demonstrations. In the nation’s capital alone, 180 police officers were injured during the Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests. Nationwide, over 700 officers reported injuries during these riots in just the first half of the year. The protests also led to significant damage to businesses and infrastructure, raising questions about the measures law enforcement used to regain control.
Baker’s forthcoming report is expected to provide further details, including the photographic evidence he referenced. If these allegations are substantiated, they could ignite a heated debate about the use of advanced crowd-control technology and the boundaries of law enforcement authority during times of civil unrest.
Just Released: Trump White House Collector’s Bobblehead!
As the nation waits for Baker’s exposé, these allegations serve as a reminder of the ongoing tensions surrounding the events of 2020 and their lasting impact on American politics. General Milley has yet to respond to these claims, but the controversy is likely to add to the scrutiny surrounding his time as the highest-ranking military officer in the country.
WATCH:
Baker concluded his interview with a promise of more revelations to come, hinting at connections that could tie these events to broader narratives involving governmental overreach and public dissent. Whether or not the allegations hold up, they have already reignited debates over accountability, civil rights, and the use of military-grade technology on American soil.
