Obama Official’s Gaza Demand STUNS Washington

>> Continued From the Previous Page <<

Leon Panetta wasted no time making his move. Appearing on CNN only days after the deal was announced, Obama’s former Defense Secretary called for something Trump had deliberately avoided: U.S. troop deployment.

“I think a U.S. troop presence makes sense,” Panetta told CNN’s “News Central.”

He admitted that regional partners would make up the bulk of the security forces but still insisted America should send its own soldiers.

“I think it’s good to have the United States have a presence there in order to make clear to the other parties that the United States isn’t going anywhere and that we’re going to see that the second stage of these negotiations are accomplished,” Panetta argued.

Panetta’s timing was no accident. Trump had just traveled to the Middle East to mark the safe release of 20 Israeli hostages. Muslim-majority nations from Indonesia to Gulf Arab states had already offered to supply security forces for Gaza. And yet, Panetta chose that moment to push for a U.S. military role.

Vice President JD Vance immediately pushed back, making it crystal clear that the Trump Administration isn’t going to play by the establishment’s old rules.

“We’re not planning to put boots on the ground,” Vance stated firmly on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

He explained that existing U.S. Central Command personnel would monitor the ceasefire from their current posts.

“What we already have is a U.S. Central Command. We already have people in that region of the world,” Vance said.

“They’re gonna monitor the terms of the ceasefire. They’re gonna monitor, ensure that the humanitarian aid is flowing.”

When pressed further about troop deployment to Gaza, Vance left no room for speculation.

“We’ve actually had – and this is one of the great successes of the president’s diplomacy from Indonesia to the Gulf Arab states – we’ve had a number of Muslim majority countries offer to step up and have them put troops on the ground to secure Gaza,” the Vice President explained.

“It’s not going to be necessary for American troops to be in Gaza,” he added.

He also shot down a series of misleading media reports claiming 200 American troops were preparing to deploy.

“So, that story is actually misreported,” Vance told ABC’s “This Week.”

“We already have troops at Central Command. We’ve had them for decades in this country. They’re going to monitor the terms of the ceasefire.”

Panetta’s latest comments shouldn’t surprise anyone who’s followed his career. His answer to nearly every conflict in the Middle East has always been the same: send more American troops.

He previously criticized Obama for withdrawing forces from Iraq in 2011, blaming that decision for ISIS’s rise. In his 2014 memoir “Worthy Fights,” Panetta wrote:
“To this day, I believe that a small U.S. troop presence in Iraq could have effectively advised the Iraqi military on how to deal with al-Qaeda’s resurgence and the sectarian violence that has engulfed the country.”

He pushed for 8,000 troops to remain in Iraq and repeatedly urged Obama to take a more aggressive stance in Syria. This was the same era in which the administration’s disastrous Benghazi operation fueled chaos in the region.

Panetta’s playbook hasn’t changed: more troops, more intervention, more endless wars.

The contrast between Trump’s diplomacy and the D.C. war machine couldn’t be clearer.

Trump brokered a deal that brought hostages home, secured a ceasefire, and established a security framework without sacrificing American lives. He worked with regional partners. Muslim-majority nations stepped up. And U.S. soldiers stayed out of harm’s way.

World leaders from France to the UAE praised the agreement. Israeli President Isaac Herzog even said Trump “deserves the Nobel Peace Prize for this.”

But for figures like Panetta, Trump’s success is more than a political headache—it’s proof their foreign policy failures are finally being exposed.

For decades, the foreign policy establishment insisted America had to be the world’s police force. Trump just showed the world there’s another way.

No endless wars. No body bags. No trillion-dollar “nation-building” boondoggles. Just results.

The old guard in Washington can’t stand it. Because if peace without American troops works in Gaza, their entire interventionist narrative collapses.

Trump’s peace deal isn’t just a win for Israel and the Middle East. It’s a stunning rebuke to the failed D.C. foreign policy class that dragged America into war after war.

And that’s exactly why they’re trying to sabotage it.