President Joe Biden’s support for unlawful gun control laws is backed by yet another demonstration of his dreadful gun illiteracy.
Joe Biden spoke on Friday in West Harford, Connecticut, at the National Safety Communities Summit. He emphasized throughout his address the law he supported that severely limits the accessibility of “pistol braces.”
WATCH: Church Leaders PRAYED you’d never see this…
According to concealedcarry.com, a pistol brace is simply a device that “attaches to the rear of a pistol and rests around the user’s forearm,” offering some degree of stabilization when firing the weapon and making it easier for a person to fire with one arm. These devices are frequently associated with AR-15 style pistols.
Biden said in an ambiguous remark that this mechanism may increase the caliber of the bullets when fired from a pistol.
Alternative news outlet Breaking911 revealed a dubious claim made by Biden in a recent address.
“Put a pistol on a brace, it turns into a gun — makes it more — you can have a higher-caliber weapon, higher-caliber bullet coming out of that gun,” Biden explained.
The fact that Biden thinks a stock attachment can change a weapon’s caliber is hilarious and worrisome.
By clicking here, you may view the entirety of Biden’s Friday address.
Biden has repeatedly shown to an international audience that he is ignorant of the fundamentals of weapons.
In an attempt to explain on a piece of legislation he supported, Biden spoke in front of a large audience at a “Now This” public discussion in October 2022. But some thought the manner in which he did it was hilarious.
As he spoke at the event, Biden stated “My legislation says there can be no more than eight bullets in a round, okay?”
NO WAY! The Shocking Truth About Trump Exposed
The plan put out by Biden would cap the number of rounds at eight. Despite the fact that a “round” usually refers to a single bullet, Biden’s strategy deviates from the status quo and feels futuristic.
Biden shown a propensity to misinterpret fundamental vocabulary when he supported a drastically curtailed Second Amendment at a campaign address in November 2019.
Biden said, “I believe in the Second Amendment, but nobody says you can have a round, a magazine with 100 clips in it.”
Biden asserted at the Democratic debates for 2020 with his annoyingly confident customary assertion that, “150 million people have been killed [by guns] since 2007.”
Between 2007 and 2019, the US population fluctuated between 300 and 330 million, according to the Census Bureau. Biden astonishingly claimed that throughout this time, deaths from legal gun ownership accounted for close to 50% of all deaths.
Some members of the American public have questioned the legality of Biden’s advise on shotgun handling.
In 2013, during a “question and answer” session with Parents Magazine, Joe Biden made the somewhat unbelievable recommendation that women should always carry a double-barrel shotgun while defending themselves.
Biden stated at the time, “[I]f you want to protect yourself, get a double-barrel shotgun. … As I told my wife … I said, ‘Jill, if there’s ever a problem, just walk out on the balcony, walk out, put that double barrel shotgun and fire two blasts outside the house.’ … You don’t need an AR-15. It’s harder to aim. It’s harder to use, and in fact, you don’t need thirty rounds to protect yourself.”
Biden’s counsel to his wife might backfire and have negative legal effects. A “warning shot” can result in the open discharge of a weapon, which is prohibited in the majority of states. Alternative options for securing our houses should be taken into account.
In 2013, Biden also took part in an interview with Field & Stream magazine, when he suggested that, in the event of a terrifying house invasion, people should “just fire the shotgun through the door,” disregarding a key rule of gun safety.
Despite the funny mistakes, it is alarming that someone with Biden’s level of ignorance could support legislation that may instantly turn millions of Americans into criminals. Those who make use of their Second Amendment rights should be especially concerned about this.
