The revelations have prompted new questions about whether California’s voter registration laws are being properly followed—particularly because state and county rules require voters to register using the address where they actually live.
According to the Los Angeles County Registrar’s Office, “A person may only register to vote at their place of residence. A business address or a P.O. Box number may only be used as a mailing address.”
That distinction has become the focus of growing scrutiny.
Speaking with the Daily Mail, Ullman insisted that none of the celebrities actually reside at his office.
“They don’t live here,” he told the Mail.
“It’s just a mailing address, but it’s not their residential address. So it gets mailed here, but they voted in their area.”
While that explanation may appear straightforward, legal experts say it does not automatically resolve the issue.
Amber Hulse of the Dhillon Law Group explained that California law still requires voters to disclose their actual domicile—even if they choose to receive mail elsewhere.
“You’re allowed to use a mailing address, like a business address or something like that,” said Amber Hulse of the Dhillon Law Group.
“But they still need to provide their residential address as their domicile. If, for example, Jennifer Aniston is using it as her residence, when it is clearly not her residence, then it would be illegal.”
Hulse emphasized that voter registration forms carry legal weight because applicants certify their information under penalty of perjury.
“When you sign up to register to vote, you’re signing under penalty of perjury. It would be the crime of perjury in California.”
She also pushed back on the notion that celebrity status alone provides an exception to the rules.
“People can hide their residential address for privacy concerns, but celebrity is not one of those options,” Hulse said.
According to the report, registrations connected to the Sunset Boulevard office stretch back more than two decades. The earliest registration reportedly belongs to director Campion Murphy in 2002, while the newest registration was allegedly filed by Jenna Dewan in December 2025.
Jennifer Aniston, who publicly backed both Joe Biden and Kamala Harris during the last presidential election cycle, was reportedly registered at the address as recently as January 29, 2025.
Critics argue that inaccurate voter registration addresses involve more than simple paperwork mistakes.
Because local elections are determined by where voters legally reside, an incorrect residence could potentially place someone in the wrong voting jurisdiction.
West Hollywood operates as its own city with separate municipal elections and local officials, making residency especially important for determining which races a voter is eligible to participate in.
Hulse explained why domicile requirements exist in the first place.
“The entire point of making people disclose their domicile is so that only people that are actual residents of these political subdivisions are actually voting in the election for people that would represent them,” Hulse said.
“For example, if you live in LA County, you should have no business in electing someone in San Diego County.”
The report arrives as conservatives continue raising concerns over election integrity, voter roll accuracy, and whether states are doing enough to verify voter eligibility and registration information.
Los Angeles County officials say they are now examining the records associated with the Sunset Boulevard office.
County spokesman Michael Sanchez confirmed the review, saying officials are “continuing to review the records associated with this address.”
He also noted that election officials process registrations when applicants certify, under penalty of perjury, that the address provided represents their residence or domicile and that all other legal requirements have been satisfied.
“If a voter attests under penalty of perjury that an address constitutes their residence or domicile, and the registration otherwise meets legal requirements, the registration is processed in accordance with state law,” he said.
None of the celebrities identified in the Daily Mail report responded to requests for comment.
Whether the ongoing county review uncovers any violations remains to be seen. However, the report is almost certain to intensify the ongoing national debate surrounding election integrity and voter registration enforcement. For many conservatives who have long argued that concerns about registration abuse deserve greater scrutiny, the allegations are likely to reinforce calls for stricter verification and more aggressive oversight of voter rolls across the country.
