The Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic and Chairman Brad Wenstrup (R-OH) have announced a future hearing that would explore the genesis of a suspected Covid-19 cover-up. This much awaited hearing, scheduled for July 11, intends to look into any conflicts of interest at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and their suppression of scientific debate on the origins of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that caused the COVID-19 pandemic.
Evidence that Dr. Anthony Fauci, a prominent public health expert, directed the creation of a document titled “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” (“Proximal Origins”) with the intention of refuting the lab-leak idea early on in the COVID-19 epidemic served as the impetus for the inquiry. The purpose of the hearing is to assess if top U.S. health authorities took any actions to downplay the lab-leak scenario and to consider the long-term effects of suppressing scientific inquiry in order to support a favored narrative.
WATCH: Church Leaders PRAYED you’d never see this…
Director Wenstrup said, “With insufficient evidence in hand and Dr. Fauci’s prompting as protection, ‘Proximal Origins’ seemingly became one of the most egregious cover-ups of the COVID-19 pandemic. Robust scientific discourse was abandoned in pursuit of a preferred, coordinated narrative.” He underlined the need for thorough research into the origins of a virus that has killed seven million people globally as opposed to making quick decisions based on dubious motivations.
The Select Subcommittee’s goal is to find any potential concealment of the sources of COVID-19 and any denial of the lab-leak theory by public health professionals, such as Dr. Fauci, Dr. Collins, and others. Wenstrup insists on a thorough investigation of all the facts in his search of the truth, passionately asserting that “the truth is nonnegotiable.”
Reputable authorities in epidemiology and virology were summoned as witnesses for the session. They are Dr. Robert Garry from Tulane University School of Medicine, Dr. W. Ian Lipkin from Columbia University, Dr. Edward Holmes from the University of Sydney, Dr. Kristian Andersen from Scripps Research, Dr. Andrew Rambaut from the University of Edinburgh, and Dr. W. Ian Lipkin.
Reputable authorities in epidemiology and virology were summoned as witnesses for the session. They are Dr. Robert Garry from Tulane University School of Medicine, Dr. W. Ian Lipkin from Columbia University, Dr. Edward Holmes from the University of Sydney, Dr. Kristian Andersen from Scripps Research, Dr. Andrew Rambaut from the University of Edinburgh, and Dr. W. Ian Lipkin.
A virologist called Andersen associated with the Scripps Research Institute proposed the theory that the virus may have originated from a laboratory during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic in January 2020. Andersen performed an early examination of the SARS-CoV-2 genome with other professionals in the area, which suggested that it may have been manufactured. Although the specifics of their conversation were kept private, Andersen’s viewpoint on this issue changed as a result of their phone contact with Dr. Anthony Fauci.
The lab leak idea was openly rejected by Andersen as a “crackpot theory.” He co-authored a study in Nature Medicine in March 2020 that claimed COVID-19 was neither fabricated or purposefully altered. Andersen received a sizeable research funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) as a result of this work.
TRENDING: Little-Known Trick Clears Blurry Eyesight
On June 16, 2023, Andersen voluntarily participated in a discussion with the Subcommittee. He disclosed during the interview that he and his co-authors used Slack instant chat extensively for their research cooperation. He recognized ownership of the Slack channel, but due to the fact that not all users had granted their permission, he was unable to allow the Subcommittee access to all of the Slack communications.
