in

Exclusive: Liz Harrington Reveals How Georgia Was Stolen!

>> Continued From the Previous Page <<

The saga continued as Barron reportedly reached out to Ryan Macias of the Elections Group, an organization that appeared prominently in various 2020 election processes across the U.S., for assistance. An important file titled “Batches Loaded Report” was shared, which later became a focal point in investigations into the recount’s integrity.

Investigative findings presented to the Georgia State Election Board later confirmed that Fulton County had violated election protocols. Over 20,000 ballots were allegedly introduced into both the original count and the recount without adequate paper ballots to justify these numbers. Despite these findings, state officials maintained that all was well, citing existing paper ballots that, controversially, were not made available for further scrutiny.

Trump Survivor Coin

In a significant twist, the investigation revealed a possible intent to destroy ballot records, alongside unresolved issues of missing and duplicate ballots which went unchecked. The state’s inquiry seemed to skirt around these issues, with officials suggesting a move past the controversy despite ongoing legal challenges and public skepticism.

Amidst these proceedings, the narrative from state officials was dismissive, seemingly aiming to downplay the severity of the complaints raised. Notably, a new Republican board member, Rick Jeffares, was absent during key discussions, leaving few to challenge the state’s dismissive stance vigorously.

The case, known as SEB2023-025, filed by Joseph Rossi and Kevin Moncla, underscores a broader issue of transparency and accountability in Georgia’s election process. They assert that thousands of votes included in the certified 2020 election results lack a tangible paper trail, highlighting systemic issues in how votes are counted and reported.

Carry 46 rounds concealed? (comfortably)

As the debate over these allegations continues, the broader implications for electoral integrity remain at the forefront. The detailed scrutiny by Harrington and others reflects a deep-seated concern among many about the veracity of electoral processes, a concern that is likely to influence future elections and ongoing discussions about democracy in America.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Medical Emergency Rumors Swirl at CNN Debate!

Trump Comeback: Plans Laid!