The deep state’s gears are always turning, aren’t they?
Despite the media’s obsessive attention on dissecting every detail of Donald Trump and the events leading up to January 6, they appear to laughably ignore obvious anomalies.
indications that could perhaps point to a completely different plot.
Steven Sund, the former Capitol Police Chief, recently made a revelation that clarifies the puzzling sequence of incidents that took place before that crucial day.
Why is the extremely secure US Capitol not being threatened by powerful organizations like the FBI and DHS?
Sund’s perceptions offer the crucial component that clarifies the complete scene.
Let’s face it, there aren’t always sunshine and roses in that picture.
“Zero for January 6.”
Anyone who hears that statement will undoubtedly get the chills.
WATCH: Church Leaders PRAYED you’d never see this…
According to numerous studies, there is widespread responsibility for these flaws in intelligence.
It is astounding, nevertheless, how the media has decided to ignore Sund’s remarks.
Below, you can watch the entire interview with Tucker Carlson:
And now for the unexpected turn.
According to reports, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi rejected Sund’s request for the National Guard to be present at the Capitol.
A perplexing action that has many people baffled.
She is meant to be the household’s protector after all, isn’t she?
The National Guard didn’t react right away even though the Capitol was being attacked; it took them several hours to get there.
On the other hand, it appears that resources were distributed to locations other than the generals’ homes.
Priorities?
The statement made by Tucker Carlson is spot on: “This sounds like a set up to me.”
Sund’s account of what happened is uncontested.
Those who value justice worry that this situation will be disregarded once more while the media makes a spectacle out of it.
The time is right to examine the motives and behaviors of persons in positions of power.
When the media fails, take action to hold them accountable by putting the onus on the public.
Learn the truth about the worst day in recent American history. It’s time to find out what actually occurred.
The Daily Caller reports:
Steven Sund, a former head of the Capitol Police, described what transpired on January 6, 2021, during the Capitol incident. In the days preceding the Capitol riot, Sund, who was present at the disturbance, claimed that information and warning indications of potential threats were concealed by federal officials.
He spoke with Carlson on his prior Fox program, but the conversation was never televised.
In secret, the FBI and DHS expressed concerns about possible violence at the “Stop the Steal” march, but they chose not to include this information in their analyses or alert Sund to stop the violence from starting.
“Think about it. I am the chief of police at the United States Capitol, probably one of the most prominent and should be the most secure building in the United States and the world. You know, you’d like to think of that,” Sund told Carlson. “But when you look at it, and don’t take my word for it, look at, there’s now at least four congressional reports talking about the intelligence failure, IG reports, GAO reports talking about various intelligence failures. But coming into it, you know, think about it. FBI, the Washington Field Office didn’t put out a single document, a single official document specific to January 6.”
“DHS didn’t put out a single official document specific to January 6,” Sund continued. “That’s very unusual. I’ve been through many other events in Washington, D.C. — FBI would host a joint conference call at the least and maybe an executive JTTF, Joint Terrorism Task Force briefing or, and for all these big events, DHS and FBI would get together and put out something that was called JIB — Joint Intelligence Bulletin. Zero for January 6.”
[…]
The possibility of storming the Capitol, injuring Capitol police, and assaulting the Supreme Court was discussed. Surprisingly, none of the intelligence assessments carried out by federal authorities identified these risks.
He asserted that despite Sund’s fervent requests, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi refused to approve his request to summon the National Guard.
“It doesn’t seem like people really want to get to the bottom of it,” Sund said. “It really doesn’t. And it just gets worse. It gets worse from there.”
[…]
“This sounds like a set up to me,” Carlson told Sund. “I’m sorry, it does.”
The experience of watching this extravaganza is similar to watching a sloppy magic show.
Even from a distance, it is simple to spot the Establishment’s sophisticated manipulations and devious misdirection.
Many people are continually employing the incorrect pieces in our effort to complete the puzzle while waiting for a miraculous result.
Let’s be open-minded and truthful about the circumstance, though.
It is vital to raise concerns, pose probing questions, and learn the truth when information about a significant event, like what happened on January 6, seems contradictory.
You do recall what happened, right?
The media’s story is unmistakably stated.
Trump is at fault.
How important elements, like Trump’s request for the National Guard, appear to have been missed is both fascinating and amusing.
Their appearance was timed to be inconveniently convenient, but Sund’s story disproves this.
Let’s concentrate on the obvious facts.
Trump made a National Guard request. Sund also did.
Both disputed.
Sund suffered a torturous 71-minute wait during the height of the chaos before getting any response.
What about the obvious delay?
1,100 National Guard members were ready in three hours.
Why are you moving so slowly?
Why was the reaction time for a pressing threat so slow?
Any security professional would be concerned, yet for some reason, this barely registers on the media’s radar.
Wait, where’s the cherry on top?
The committee from January 6th did not maintain records.
The ease, oh the ease!
It is nearly lyrical.
We are presented with a story that is riddled with contradictions, and the institutions in charge of defending justice and the truth are not maintaining proper records.
It is no longer possible to ignore the growing inequities and the pervasive sense of a serious error.
Newsweek goes into great detail about how this issue is upsetting people, including those who do not consider themselves conspiracy theorists.
Sund expresses his worries about the events of the incident on January 6 in a recently obtained video.
Sund admits his concern about the path of events but asserting he is not a conspiracy theorist. He claims that he was refused National Guard support both before and during the attack and that there was a 71-minute delay in his ability to contact National Guard forces.
“You’re in a fight, a fight for a couple of minutes wears you out,” he said. “Let me tell you, it wears you out.”
Around 1:00 p.m., Sund requested National Guard troops. on January 6, but he had to hold off on an answer for 71 minutes. According to NPR, it took more than three hours from Sund’s initial request for 1,100 National Guard members to be activated.
We are looking for the plain truth, not a hoax.
It’s time we took matters into our own hands and brought the issue to light in case certain media outlets decide to ignore it.
The present account seems more and more like fabrication as new information becomes available.
Should we be surprised at all, hardly, (D)emon-cRATS have been usurping the constitution by rigging elections and persecuting the opposition for decades without any push back! It’s crunch time, either these treacherous demons are corralled and made to pay or you will, hell, we already are! WTFU! BAA, BAA, BAA…