>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
On February 18, Badger Books allegedly malfunctioned, incorrectly checking in absentee ballots that had never been returned. The result? Some townships saw voter turnout numbers jump by as much as 27%—a shocking error that could have severe consequences in a tight race.
The whistleblower describes an absentee ballot process riddled with weak points:
- Voters request an absentee ballot online or by phone.
- The request is processed in Badger Books, and clerks print labels for the ballot.
- The ballot is mailed, recorded as sent, and then logged again when returned.
But here’s where the problem arises: nothing prevents election officials from printing duplicate labels, tracking unreturned ballots, and fabricating votes with forged signatures.
“There is no signature verification, no ID matching an address, and nothing preventing someone from printing extra labels and submitting fraudulent ballots.”
During the February 18 primary, Badger Books suffered a major barcode malfunction, automatically checking in ballots that had never been returned. The clerk provided damning numbers:
- One township had 5 absentee ballots falsely recorded as received, despite only 40 being sent out—an error rate of 12.5%.
- Another township saw 3 ballots incorrectly marked as returned out of 32 mailed—an error rate of 9.4%.
- When calculated against actual returned ballots, the error rates soared to 26.3% and 27.3%, respectively.
These numbers suggest a system deeply flawed and highly susceptible to fraud.
The clerk, an election worker with years of experience, insists these issues aren’t new. Similar irregularities, they claim, have been happening since at least 2018. But with the April Supreme Court election looming, the situation is more urgent than ever.
Just Released: Trump White House Collector’s Bobblehead!
The whistleblower explained how a barcode scanning error in Badger Books caused massive discrepancies:
“Badger Books reads the barcodes on absentee ballots. For the November 5, 2024 election, they lengthened the barcode to 9 or 10 digits. For the February 18, 2025 primary, they were supposed to shorten it back to the standard 8 digits. HOWEVER, someone in IT shortened it to 7 digits. So when we scanned in an absentee ballot, it picked up only the first 7 digits of the barcode instead of all 8.”
The impact of this error was significant:
- In one township, 5 ballots were wrongly recorded as returned.
- In another township, 3 were falsely marked as received.
- One ballot later arrived, reducing the discrepancy in one case, but the error rates remained shocking.
The clerk issued a chilling warning: “Imagine the Supreme Court election in 31 days and a glitch like that happening. A 27% error rate in Milwaukee or Madison could allow poll workers to fill in ballots and run them through the machines so that the Badger Books number matches the tabulator machine.”
The whistleblower clarified they are not accusing anyone of fraud—but they are pointing out a system vulnerability that could be exploited.
Adding to the concerns, conservative activist Scott Pressler has sounded the alarm on what he calls an effort by leftist billionaire George Soros to manipulate Wisconsin’s Supreme Court. According to Pressler, Soros is attempting to buy the state’s highest court, which could pave the way for liberals to gerrymander Wisconsin’s congressional maps—a move that could tilt the balance of power in the U.S. House of Representatives in 2026.
With such glaring election system flaws and a high-stakes Supreme Court battle on the horizon, Wisconsin voters are left wondering: Will their elections be secure, or will these vulnerabilities be exploited to tip the scales?
