>> Continued From the Previous Page <<
According to details extracted from a footnote in the legal motion, which was closely analyzed by The Gateway Pundit, the Special Counsel admitted the reorganization of the classified documents post-seizure. This admission contradicts previous statements by the Department of Justice (DOJ), which had assured the court that the documents were maintained in the condition they were found.
In a stark confession, the DOJ recanted its earlier assurances during a court hearing on April 12, 2024. In this session, when questioned about the condition of the seized boxes, government representatives acknowledged that except for one exception involving the extraction of classified documents and insertion of placeholders, the boxes were tampered with. This directly opposes their earlier stance, where they claimed the boxes were preserved in their original state post-raid.
Moreover, in August 2022, the DOJ misled the court regarding the color-coded sheets displayed in a widely circulated photo of the classified documents. Initially, these colors were purported to indicate the classification status of the documents. However, it was later admitted that these sheets were merely placeholders, not indicators of classification.
Adding further to the FBI’s modifications, the agency after transporting the boxes to the Washington Field Office (WFO), created an index correlating the documents with specific classification markings. The FBI then replaced the original handwritten sheets with new classified cover sheets tagged with the index codes. These alterations were supposed to help identify the documents’ classification status. Nonetheless, not all original handwritten sheets were removed during this process, which may lead to further complications in establishing the original state of the documents.
Carry 46 rounds concealed? (comfortably)
This series of revelations about the handling of classified documents has not only raised questions about the procedural fidelity of the FBI but also intensified the legal and political drama surrounding former President Trump. As the case unfolds, these admissions by Jack Smith and the subsequent revelations about the FBI’s actions are likely to fuel more debates and discussions about the integrity of law enforcement agencies and their actions in politically sensitive cases.
I still have not heard an explanation on why the raiding agents wore backpacks. That is not standard procedure. Was it to allow the agents to carry evidence “INTO’ MAL?